Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3929 (KAR)

SHRI M MUNIRAJU v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/1461/2024 · 2026-04-22

D K Singh, T M Nadaf

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:22019-DB WP No. 1461 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF APRIL, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF WRIT PETITION NO. 1461 OF 2024 (LA-BDA) BETWEEN: 1. SHRI. M. MUNIRAJU, S/O MUNI CHIKKANNA, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, 2. SHRI. RAVI, S/O KONERAPPA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, 3. SHRI. MANJUNATH, S/O. KONERAPPA, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, 4. SHRI. GOWRISHA, S/O. KONERAPPA, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, 5. SHRI. GOWDARAJA, S/O. MUNISWAMAPPA, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, 6. SHRI. NARAYANASWAMY, S/O. KAMALAPPA, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, Digitally signed by REKHA R Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:22019-DB WP No. 1461 of 2024 7. SHRI. KANTHAKUMAR, S/O LATE T. THAMMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, 8. SMT. NEELAMMA, W/O. CHIKKA MUNIYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 79 YEARS, 9. C. MANJUNATH, S/O. CHIKKA MUNIYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, 10. DODDAKALLAPPA, S/O. DANDU CHIKKA CHIKKANNA, AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS, 11. KRISHNAMURTHY, S/O. DODDA KALLAPPA, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, 12. CHIKKANNA, S/O. DODDA KALLAPPA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, 13. SHRI. HARISH, S/O. CHIKKA KALLAPPA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, 14. SHRI. A.G. SRINVIAS MURTHY, S/O. DANDHU CHIKKANNA, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, 15. SHRI. NAVEENKUMAR, S/O. A.G. SRINIVASA MURTHY, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:22019-DB WP No. 1461 of 2024 ALL ARE RESIDENTS OF DASARAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R. PURAM HOBLI, NOW BANGALORE EAST TALUK, BANGALORE DISTRICT. ALL ARE REPRESENTED BY SHRI. M. SRINVIAS, S/O SHRI M RAMARAJ, THE POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER OF LAND OWNERS OF LAND BEARING SY NO.65/3, SITUATED AT DASARAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R. PURAM HOBLI, BENGALURU EAST TALUK. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. H.N. BASAVARAJU, ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU - 560 001. 2. BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, BY ITS COMMISSIONER, KUMARA PARK WEST, BENGALURU - 560 001. 3. SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITON OFFICER, BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 001. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:22019-DB WP No. 1461 of 2024 4. THE COMMISSIONER, BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, EX-OFFICIO CONVENER OF COMMITTEE HEADED BY THE HON'BLE JUSTICE (RETD.) K.N. KESHAVANARAYANA AND OTHERS. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.G.S. ARUNA, HCGP FOR R1 SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 TO R4) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER WRIT TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED REPORT DATED:18.01.2023 IN No.KNKC No-93/2022 (DASARAHALLI) AS PER ANNEXURE-D AND ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS DIRECTING THE RESPONDENT No.2 AND 4 TO PLACE THE GRIEVANCES OF THE LAND OWNERS/ PETITIONERS AS PER ANNEXURE-C AND C1 BEFORE THE COMMITTEE FOR FRESH CONSIDERATION WITH A DIRECTION TO FOLLOW THE GUIDELINES FORMULATED BY THE DIVISION BENCH OF THIS HON'BLE COURT IN WA NO.2624/2005 (BDA Vs STATE OF KARNATAKA AND OTHERS REPORTED IN ILR 2006 KAR PAGE No.318 AS WELL AS THE OBSERVATIONS OF THE HON'BLE APEX COURT PASSED IN BONDU RAMASWAMY CASE REPORTED IN (2010) 7 SCC 129 AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:22019-DB WP No. 1461 of 2024 ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH) Learned counsel for the petitioner was not present in the first round when the matter was called. He is not present in the second round when the matter is taken up at 4:20 pm. Therefore, we have no option but to dismiss the petition for non-prosecution. Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (D K SINGH) JUDGE Sd/- (T.M.NADAF) JUDGE TKN List No.: 2 Sl No.: 8