Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 39273 (CHH)

SHIV KUMAR SARTHI v. THE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WA/983/2026 · 2026-10-11

Shri Santosh Sharma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 CGHC010375872026 2026:CGHC:43967-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WA No. 983 of 2026 Shiv Kumar Sarthi S/o Shri Hridaylal Sarthi Aged About 49 Years Occupation Assistant Teacher (L.B.) Government Primary School Hirri (Masturi), Block Masturi, District Bilaspur, (C.G.) (Presently Working At Government Primary School Hardi, (Loharsi), Block Masturi, District- Bilaspur ) ... Appellant(s) versus 1. The State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department of School Education Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 2. The Commissioner President of Rationalization Committee Bilaspur Division, Bilaspur, District- Bilaspur (C.G.) 3. The Joint Director/ Secretary Divisional Rationalization Committee , Education Division, Bilaspur, (C.G.) 4. The Collector / President of District Rationalization Committee, District- Bilaspur (C.G.) 5. The District Education Officer Secretary of District Rationalization Committee, District- Bilaspur (C.G.) 6. The Sub Divisional Officer Revenue / President Of Rationalization Committee Tahsil Masturi, District- Bilaspur (C.G.) 7. The Block Education Officer Secretary of Rationalization Committee, Block Masturi, District- Bilaspur (C.G.) ...Respondent(s) (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) BRIJMOHAN MORLE Digitally signed by BRIJMOHAN MORLE Date: 2026.10.12 17:29:01 +0530 2 For Appellant : Mr. Roop Ram Naik, Advocate. For Respondents/State : Mr. Amit Buxy, Deputy Government Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Krushna Ram Mohapatra , Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Santosh Sharma , Judge Order on Board Per Krushna Ram Mohapatra , Chief Justice 12 .10.2026 1. Heard Mr. Roop Ram Naik, learned counsel for the appellant. Also heard Mr. Amit Buxy, learned Deputy Government Advocate, appearing for the State/respondents. 2. Order dated 11.09.2026 passed by the learned Single Judge in WPS No. 13837 of 2025 under Annexure A/1 is under challenge in the writ appeal. 3. In course of hearing, learned counsel for the appellant prays for withdrawal of the writ appeal. 4. Accordingly, the writ appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- Sd/- (Santosh Sharma) (Krushna Ram Mohapatra) Judge Chief Justice Brijmohan