Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3926 (KAR)

SMT. NANDINI @ AKSHATHA D. G. v. SRI. MANJUNATH

MFA/2828/2018 · 2026-04-23

Jayant Banerji, Rajesh Rai K

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:22358-DB MFA No. 2828 of 2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF APRIL, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 2828 OF 2018 (FC) BETWEEN: SMT. NANDINI @ AKSHATHA D. G. W/O SRI MANJUNATH BALEKUNDRI AGE: 30 YEARS R/O NO 70, SHIVARANJINI RADHAKRISHNA NAGAR 2ND MAIN ROAD, DHARWAD - 580 003 PRESENTLY THEY ARE RESIDING AT AKSHATA D.G, D/O GANGADHARAPPA D.P 3428/C61A, 62,62A PANCHASANGAMA BASAVESHWAR NAGAR DAVANAGERE - 577 006 …APPELLANT (BY SRI. BASAVARAJ GODACHI, ADVOCATE) AND: SRI. MANJUNATH S/O VEERANNA BALEKUNDRI AGE: 37 YEARS OCC: CGI INFO SYSTEMS BANGALORE, R/O # 51/100, C/O NARAYANAGOWDAR, 21ST MAIN, 21ST CROSS, Digitally signed by PANKAJA S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:22358-DB MFA No. 2828 of 2018 VIJAYNAGAR NEAR MARUTHI MANDIR, BENGALURU ADDNL ADDRSS: R/O # 25, BANASHANAKRI LAYOUT 2ND CROSS, SULLA ROAD, HUBLI - 23 PRESENTLY WORKINNG AS A SR. SOFTWARE ENGINEER, IN CGI INFO SYSTEM HAL AIRPORT ROAD, BENGALURU …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. MANJUNATH - PARTY IN PERSON) THIS MFA IS FILED U/S 19(1) OF FAMILY COURT ACT, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED: 02.08.2017 PASSED IN M.C.NO.785/2015 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, BENGALURU, ALLOWING THE PETITION FILED U/S 13(1)(ia) & (ib) OF THE HINDU MARRIAGE ACT. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR DISMISSAL, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:22358-DB MFA No. 2828 of 2018 ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI) Despite the previous order passed by this Court, the translated copies of the documents/depositions on record duly attested and supported by an affidavit have not been filed. 2. Learned counsel for the appellant is present, who has not stated anything about this, he only states that the matter be referred for mediation. 3. However, since a direction was made that the appeal shall be dismissed if the needful is not done, this appeal is dismissed. SD/- (JAYANT BANERJI) JUDGE SD/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE HKV List No.: 2 Sl No.: 15