Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2026:CGHC:15923
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP227 No. 45 of 2025 Lokesh Tamrakar S/o Shri Ramkumar Tamrakar Aged About 49 Years R/o Lili Chowk, Purani Basti, Raipur C.G.
... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Lubhani Tamrakar D/o Late Umashankar Tamrakar Aged About 43 Years R/o Near Bus Stand, Village And Tehsil Berla, District Bemetara (C.G.) 2 - Rajkumar Tamrakar S/o Late Umashankar Tamrakar Aged About 60 Years R/o Near Bus Stand, Village And Tehsil Berla, District Bemetara (C.G.)
... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shalvik Tiwari, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Hemant Kumar Agrawal, Advocate alongwith Ms. Sakshi Kukreja, Advocate (Hon’ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J.)
Order on Board 07/04/2026
1. Heard.
2.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the proceeding before the learned trial Court has been concluded, SUMIT KUMAR Digitally signed by SUMIT KUMAR Date: 2026.04.08 15:40:34 +0530
2 therefore, he does not want to press the instant writ petition, as the same has become infructuous and he may be permitted to raise all the grounds raised in the present writ petition in the subsequent challenge against the final order.
3. The submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners is not opposed by the respondent counsel.
4. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties, the present writ petition is dismissed as not pressed with aforesaid liberty. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge Sumit