- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010182902021 NC: 2026:KHC:48882 WP No. 13592 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 13592 OF 2021 (L-PF) BETWEEN: AVINASH REDDY PENDULURU AGED 36 YEARS S/O CHANDRA SEKHAR G NO.114, 6TH CROSS, 29TH MAIN BTM LAYOUT, 2ND STAGE BANGALORE-560076. …PETITIONER (BY SMT. MAMATHA S, ADVOCATE) AND: ASSISTANT PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANISATION REGIONAL OFFICE, K R PURAM NO F-28, NSU BLOCK-I TI CAMPUS (BANGALORE PLANT) K R PRUAM, BANGALORE-560016 KARNATAKA STATE. …RESPONDENT (BY SMT. NANDITA HALDIPUR, ADVOCATE) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH FINAL ORDER DATED: 19.09.2020 IN CASE DIARY NO.266/2017 PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT VIDE ANNEXURE- A AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR DISMISSAL, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: Digitally signed by DHANALAKSHMI MURTHY Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010182902021 NC: 2026:KHC:48882 WP No. 13592 of 2021 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD ORAL ORDER On 07.09.2026, this Court passed the following order: “This Court, by order dated 19.08.2021, has entertained this writ petition subject to the condition that the petitioner is thereby directed to deposit 75% of the determined amount. Even today, that order has not been complied with. The petitioner filed I.A.No.3/2022 for exemption from that order. In spite of the matter being posted before this Court number of times, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, post this matter on 09.09.2026 at the top of the list under the caption ‘dismissal’. “ Today when the matter was called out, none appeared on behalf of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the respondent is present. - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010182902021 NC: 2026:KHC:48882 WP No. 13592 of 2021 Even to this day, the petitioner has not complied with the order dated 19.08.2021 passed by this Court. It appears that the petitioner is not diligent in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. Sd/- (H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD) JUDGE DM LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 1