Ramakant Patel @ Ramakant Chaudhary v. Laalmati Devi
MA/789/2025 · 2026-02-05
Rajiv Roy
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 39174 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 39174 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Appeal No.789 of 2025 ======================================================
1. Ramakant Patel @ Ramakant Chaudhary S/o Late Lal Parikhan Chaudhary, Resident of village- Padarkhap, Tola - Shivrajpur, P.S. - Bhairoganj, District- West Champaran.
2. Diwakar Patel, S/o Ramakant Patel @ Ramakant Chaudhary, Resident of village- Padarkhap, Tola - Shivrajpur, P.S. - Bhairoganj, District- West Champaran.
3. Prabhakar Patel, S/o Ramakant Patel @ Ramakant Chaudhary, Resident of village- Padarkhap, Tola - Shivrajpur, P.S. - Bhairoganj, District- West Champaran. ... ... Appellant/s Versus
1. Laalmati Devi W/o Verma Mahto, Resident of village- Padarkhap, Tola - Shivrajpur, P.S. - Bhairoganj, District- West Champaran.
2. Maina Devi, W/o Jaiprakash Patel, Resident of village- Padarkhap, Tola - Shivrajpur, P.S. - Bhairoganj, District- West Champaran.
3. Jaiprakash Patel, S/o Lalparikhan Chaudhary, Resident of village- Padarkhap, Tola - Shivrajpur, P.S. - Bhairoganj, District- West Champaran. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr. Aakash Choudhary, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 2 05-02-2026 Heard the parties.
2. The present appeal has been preferred:
“against the Order dated 24.07.2025 passed by Learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Bagha, West Champaran in Title Suit No.13 of 2024, whereby and whereunder the Learned Court below has rejected the Petition dated 26.05.2025 filed on behalf of the
Patna High Court MA No.789 of 2025(2) dt.05-02-2026 2/2 Plaintiffs/Appellants under Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 read with Section 151 of C.P.C and Section 39 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 for restraining the Defendant 1st Party from evicting them from the suit land and stopping the Defendants / Respondents from making temporary or permanent construction over the land in question and also from restraining them from any type of transfer the suit land till the final disposal of the case.”
3. Mr. Aakash Choudhary, learned counsel for the appellants prays for withdrawal of the appeal with liberty to file appropriate petition before appropriate authority/court.
4. Granting said liberty, M.A. No. 789 of 2025 is
disposed of as withdrawn.
vinayak/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U