Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 39160 (CHH)

MANISH VISHWAKARMA v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/7507/2026 · 2026-10-12

Shri Bibhu Datta Guru

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 CGHC010395312026 2026:CGHC:44205 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 7507 of 2026 Manish Vishwakarma S/o Shivram Vishwakarma Aged About 35 Years Constable No. 2949, Police Department, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh, Present Address Gram - Biltara, Thana Chowki, Lakhanpur, District - Surajpur Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Principal Secretary, Home (Police) Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2. Director General Of Police, Chhattisgarh Police Headquarters, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3. Inspector General Of Police Raipur Range, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 4. Superintendent Of Police District Raipur Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Mr. Rahil Arun Kochar along with Ms. Swarnim P. Kochar, Advocate For Respondents/ State : Mr. S.S. Badgaiya, G.A. Hon’ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru, Judge Order on Board 13/10/2026 1. Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the present writ petition has been filed seeking a limited direction to Respondent No. 2, Director General of Police, to consider and decide the Petitioner's pending representations dated 24.09.2026 and 24.10.2024 (Annexures P-1 and P-2), whereby the Petitioner has JYOTI SHARMA Digitally signed by JYOTI SHARMA Date: 2026.10.14 10:44:41 +0530 2 sought a decision on his pending mercy petition concerning his removal from service. 2. Learned State counsel submits that, if the aforesaid representations are pending consideration before the competent authority, the same shall be considered and decided within a stipulated period, in accordance with law. 3. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record. 4. Considering the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the Petitioner and the submission advanced by learned State counsel, this Court deems it appropriate to dispose of the present writ petition with a direction to Respondent No. 2 to consider and decide the Petitioner's representations dated 24.09.2026 and 24.10.2024 (Annexures P-1 and P-2), in accordance with law, by passing a reasoned and speaking order, preferably within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 5. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the Petitioner's claim. 6. With the aforesaid direction, the present writ petition stands disposed of. SD/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) JUDGE Jyoti