[2026:RJ-JP:10937] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3064/2026 Sagar S/o Ayub, R/o House No. Mkb-184, Kachchi Basti, Gyan Vihar Mandir Ke Paas, Gopi Meena Ki Taal, Jagatpura, Police Station Jawahar Circle, Jaipur Chhota Bhai Suraj Ali Ka Makaan, Madari Colony, Gaushala, Police Station Sanganer, District Jaipur. (At Present Petitioner Is Confined In Central Jail Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Kirodee Lal Meena For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Choudhary, PP HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA Order 16/03/2026 1. This bail application has been filed on behalf of the accused- petitioner under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. in connection with FIR No. 101/2026 registered at Police Station Muhana Jaipur City(South) for the offence(s) under Sections 305 and 331(4) of BNS. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. Learned counsel also contends that the petitioner is in custody since 07.12.2026 and recovery has already been effected. He further submits that petitioner is not required for further investigation. He submits that the alleged offences are triable by Magistrate and conclusion of trial may take time, so no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in custody and therefore, prays that the [2026:RJ-JP:10937] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-3064/2026] petitioner may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner hereinabove and submits that there are criminal antecedents against accused-petitioner Sagar S/o Ayub. 4. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is in custody since 07.12.2026; the alleged offences are triable by Magistrate and trial will take its own time, hence, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail. 5. Therefore, this bail application under Section 483 BNSS is accordingly, allowed and the accused-petitioner Sagar S/o Ayub is ordered to be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 6. It is made clear that the accused-petitioner shall not be involved in any other offence(s) during currency of the bail and he shall mark his presence on 1st and 15th day of every month in the concerned police station. 7. In case of any breach of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to to move the application [2026:RJ-JP:10937] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-3064/2026] against the accused-petitioner for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court. 8. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance. (SANGEETA SHARMA),J HEENA/91