Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3913 (RAJ)

SHER SINGH S/O RAM SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/1791/2026 · 2026-04-07

Sangeeta Sharma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:14360] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1791/2026 Sher Singh S/o Ram Singh, Age About 35 Years, R/o Kuli, Police Station Dantaramgarh, District Sikar, Rajasthan. ----Accused Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Non-Petitioner For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Gajveer Singh Rajawat For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Choudhary, PP Mr. Shantnu Bansal HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA Order 07/04/2026 1. This bail application has been filed under Section 482 BNSS in connection with FIR No. 318/2024 registered at Police Station Dantaramgarh, District Sikar for the offence(s) under Sections 189(2), 126(2), 115(2), 140(3), 307, 352, 351(2) of BNS. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He also submits that the accused-petitioner has joined the investigation as directed. He further submits that no recovery is required to be made. He further submits that co-accused namely Yuvraj Singh Shekhawat has already been enlarged on bail under Section 482 BNSS by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 05.01.2026 in S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 17079/2025. He further submits that co-accused persons namely Jaipal Singh and Hanuman Singh have also been enlarged on bail [2026:RJ-JP:14360] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-1791/2026] by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 22.10.2024 in S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 12510/2024. He further submits that none of the injuries sustained by the injured are grievous or fatal, therefore, prays that the accused-petitioner may be granted the benefit of anticipatory bail under Section 482 BNSS. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the submissions made by the learned counsel for the accused- petitioner hereinabove and submits that there are criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioner. 4. Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case and considering the fact that the co-accused persons have already been enlarged on bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court; no recovery is required to be made; none of the injuries sustained by the injured are grievous or fatal. Hence, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, deems just and proper to extend the benefit of anticipatory bail to the accused-petitioner. 5. Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application under Section 482 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that in the event of arrest of Sher Singh S/o Ram Singh, he shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of S.H.O./I.O./Arresting Officer of the concerned Police Station in FIR No. 318/2024 on the following conditions:- (i) that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; [2026:RJ-JP:14360] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-1791/2026] (ii) that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and; (iii) that the petitioner shall not leave India without previous permission of the court. (SANGEETA SHARMA),J KAVISH /61