The District Educational Officer (Elementary) v. S.Dhavamani
WA(MD)/869/2026 · 2026-06-19
M Jothiraman, N Sathish Kumar
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 39125 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 39125 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
WA(MD)No.869 of 2026 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 19.06.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR and THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.JOTHIRAMAN WA(MD)No.869 of 2026 and CMP(MD)No.7419 of 2026
1. The District Educational Officer (Elementary), Thoothukudi Office at Pudukottai 628 103, Thoothukudi District
2. The Block Educational Officer, Thoothukudi Urban, Thoothukudi District. ... Appellants Vs.
1. Mrs.S.Dhavamani
2. BMC Primary School, Represented by its Secretary, Millerpuram, Thoothukudi-8. ... Respondents PRAYER :- Writ Appeals filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent, against the order made in W.P(MD)No.28617 of 2025 dated 23.01.2026. 1/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WA(MD)No.869 of 2026 For Appellants : Mr.M.S.Parthiban, Counsel for State For R1 : Mr.T.Aswin Raja Simman
JUDGMENT (Judgment of the Court was made by N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.) Challenging the order of the learned Single Judge allowing the writ petition by setting aside the orders impugned in the writ petition rejecting incentive increment to the petitioner, this writ appeal is filed by the Government.
2. The learned Single Judge taking note of the fact that in the earlier round of litigation, a Division Bench of this Court in W.A(MD)No.470 of 2018 has clearly held that the writ petitioner is entitled to two incentive increments for acquiring M.Ed., degree while serving as Secondary Grade Teacher. The State has not challenged the said judgment as such, the judgment has attained finality. Despite the same, the writ petitioner's claim for incentive increments had been negative vide orders impugned in the writ petition. G.O.Ms.No.155 came into force on 03.10.2022, whereas the writ petitioner was benefited with the incentive increments for possessing the higher qualification of M.Ed 2/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WA(MD)No.869 of 2026 degree with effect from 01.09.1996. However, by virtue of the orders impugned in the writ petition, the said benefit was sought to be taken away. As stated supra, the Division Bench in W.A(MD)No.470 of 2018 has clearly held that the writ petitioner is entitled to two incentive increments for acquiring M.Ed., degree and the said judgment also attained finality. In our view, the orders impugned in the writ petition cannot be sustained. The learned Single Judge has rightly quashed those orders and allowed the writ petition. We do not find any merits in this appeal.
3. Accordingly, this Writ Appeal is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
[N.S.K., J.] & [M.J.R., J.] 19.06.2026 bala To
1. The District Educational Officer (Elementary), Thoothukudi Office at Pudukottai 628 103, Thoothukudi District 3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WA(MD)No.869 of 2026
2. The Block Educational Officer, Thoothukudi Urban, Thoothukudi District. 4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WA(MD)No.869 of 2026 N.SATHISH KUMAR
, J.
AND M.JOTHIRAMAN, J. bala
JUDGMENT MADE IN WA(MD)No.869 of 2026 DATED : 19.06.2026 5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis