Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3911 (GAU)

MRS MEERA SAIKIA v. INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY

I.A.(Civil)/1027/2026 · 2026-03-31

Mridul Kumar Kalita

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/4 GAHC010064852026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/1027/2026 MRS MEERA SAIKIA WIFE OF BHUBAN CHANDRA SAIKIA, RESIDENT OF ANANDA PATH, HOUSE NO. 1, AMBIKAGIRI NAGAR, R.G. BARUA ROAD, ZOO ROAD, KAMRUP METRO, ASSAM781024 VERSUS INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY , GUWAHATI, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, IIT, GUWAHATI, NORTH GUWAHATI IN THE DISTRICT OF KAMRUP, ASSAM, PIN-781039 2:ON THE DEATH OF KRISHNA CHANDRA BARUAH HIS LEGAL HEIRS RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- RAJADUAR P.S- NORTH GUWAHATI DISTRICT- KAMRUP ASSAM PIN-781030 2:SMT TANUJA BARUAH WIFE OF LATE DILIP CHANDRA BARUAH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- RAJADUAR P.S- NORTH GUWAHATI DISTRICT- KAMRUP ASSAM PIN-781030 3:SRI HRIDOYJIT BARUAH SON OF LATE DILIP CHANDRA BARUAH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE RAJADUAR P.S- NORTH GUWAHATI DISTRICT- KAMRUP ASSAM Page No.# 2/4 PIN781030 RESPONDENT NO. 1 2 ARE WIFE AND SON OF LATE DILIP CHANDRA BARUAH ELDEST SON OF LATE KRISHNA CHANDRA BARUAH 4:SRI RATUL BARUAH SONS OF LATE KRISHNA CHANDRA BARUAH ALL ARE RESIDENTS OF VILLAGE RAJADUAR P.S.- NORTH GUAWAHTI DISTRICTKAMRUP ASSAM PIN-781030. 5:SRI MUKUT BARUAH SONS OF LATE KRISHNA CHANDRA BARUAH ALL ARE RESIDENTS OF VILLAGE RAJADUAR P.S.- NORTH GUAWAHTI DISTRICTKAMRUP ASSAM PIN-781030. 6:SRI SAURAV BARUAH SONS OF LATE KRISHNA CHANDRA BARUAH ALL ARE RESIDENTS OF VILLAGE RAJADUAR P.S.- NORTH GUAWAHTI DISTRICTKAMRUP ASSAM PIN-781030. 7:THE COLLECTOR OF KAMRUP AMINGAON DISTRICT- KAMRUP ASSAM PIN-78103 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. R B PHOOKAN, MS D DAS Advocate for the Respondent : SC, IITG, Page No.# 3/4 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MRIDUL KUMAR KALITA ORDER Date : 01.04.2026 1. Heard Ms. D. Das, the learned counsel for the applicant. 2. This Interlocutory Application has been filed by the applicant in connection with the Interlocutory Application No.469/2026 airing out of I.A. (Civil)/3026/2025 in connection with L.A. Appeal bearing No. 5153/2025 praying for rectification of a typographical error, which has crept in the order dated 20.03.2026 in I.A. (Civil)/469/2026. 3. Since the error which has been pointed by the learned counsel for the applicant is in connection with date of disposal of Interlocutory Application i.e. I.A. (Civil)/3026/2025 only, the notice to the opposite party in this Interlocutory Application is waived. 4. The learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the Interlocutory Application for condoning the delay in preferring the connected appeal i.e., I.A.(Civil)/3026/2025 was disposed of by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court on 20.02.2026. However, in Paragraph No.2 of the order dated 20.03.2026 in I.A. (Civil)/469/2026 it has been mentioned as 28.02.2026 in place of 20.02.2026. She submits that as the same appears to be typographical error, the said error is required to be rectified. 5. I have considered the submission made by the learned counsel for the applicant as well as gone through the materials on record. Page No.# 4/4 6. On perusal of the records, it appears that the I.A.(Civil) 3026/2025 was disposed of by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court on 20.02.2026, hence, it appears that in Paragraph No.2 of the order dated 20.03.2026 passed in I.A.(Civil)/469/2026, the date of disposal of the I.A.(Civil)/3026/2025 has been wrongly mentioned as 28.02.2026. 7. Since, the same appears to be an inadvertent typographical mistake, the same is required to be corrected. 8. Accordingly, the date “28.02.2026” mentioned in line No. 8 and line No. 11 of the Paragraph No.2 of the order dated 20.03.2026 passed in I.A. (Civil)/469/2026 shall be read as 20.02.2026 instead of 28.02.2026. 9. This Interlocutory Application is accordingly, allowed and disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant