SAVITA DEVI ALIAS SABITA DEVI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./10681/2025 · 2026-01-27
Gautam Kumar Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3910 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3910 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:1996 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 10681 of 2025
------ Savita Devi @ Sabita Devi, W/o Sandip Singh @ Sandeep Singh, R/o Village-Alonkera Matimtoli, P.O. & P.S.-Palkot, District-Gumla
.... .... …. Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand
.... .... .... Opposite Party
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GAUTAM KUMAR CHOUDHARY
For the Petitioner : Mr. Aman Kumar, Advocate
Ms. Ruby Yadav, Advocate
For the State : Mr. Subodh Kumar Dubey, APP For the Informant : Mr. Ritesh Kumar, Advocate
------
Order No.03 / Dated : 27.01.2026.
Heard both the sides.
This bail application has been filed on behalf of Savita Devi @ Sabita Devi who is in custody since 17.09.2025 in connection with Gumla P.S. Case No. 375 of 2023 for the offence registered under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468 471, 34 and 120B of the IPC pending in the Court of C.J.M., Gumla is pressed into motion.
It is submitted by the learned counsel on behalf of petitioner that she is in judicial custody since 17.09.2025 and charge-sheet has already been submitted in this case. The allegation against this petitioner is that she misappropriated Rs. 2,45,000/- from the informant and total sum of Rs. 15,81,000/- from the members of mahila mandal which was received by the petitioner, but not deposited in the account of the Women Help Organization.
It is further submitted that the matter has been amicably settled between the informant and others in pursuance of the said settlement, 50% of the said amount had already been refunded to the victims and an undertaking has been given to return rest of the amount within eight months vide settlement dated
22.01.2026.
Learned A.P.P. for the State, assisted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant, does not dispute the assertions made on behalf of the petitioner. Let the copy of the said settlement be kept on record.
Considering the settlement between the parties, subject to the terms and conditions of settlement made by the petitioner, the above-named petitioner is
2026:JHHC:1996
directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/-(Twenty- Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Court below.
Pending I.A., if any, stands disposed of.
(Gautam Kumar Choudhary, J.) Pawan/ Uploaded 28.01.2026