R/CR.MA/22592/2026 ORDER DATED: 28/09/2026 (GJHC240702182026) IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR REGULAR BAIL - AFTER CHARGESHEET) NO. 22592 of 2026 ========================================================== PARMESHWAR SAMIRSINH PALAS Versus STATE OF GUJARAT ========================================================== Appearance: MR HEMANT MAKWANA(3622) for the Applicant(s) No. 1 MS SHRUTI PATHAK, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1 ========================================================== CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HASMUKH D. SUTHAR Date : 28/09/2026 ORDER [1.0] RULE. Learned APP waives service of rule for the respondent- State. [2.0] The present application is filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short “BNSS”) for regular bail in connection with FIR being C.R.No.11821011260972 of 2026 registered with Dahod “A” Division Police Station, Dahod, for the offences under Sections 61(2)(a), 310, and 311 of BNS, 2023. [3.0] Learned advocate appearing on behalf of the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the offence. He, therefore submits that, considering the nature of the offence, the applicant may be enlarged on regular bail by imposing suitable conditions. [4.0] Learned APP appearing on behalf of the respondent-State has R/CR.MA/22592/2026 ORDER DATED: 28/09/2026 (GJHC240702182026) opposed the present application and requested to dismiss the present application for regular bail on the ground that the applicant is very much involved in the present offence. Hence, the present application be dismissed. [5.0] While granting bail, the Court has to consider the involvement of the accused in the alleged offence, the jurisdiction to grant bail has to be exercised on the basis of the well settled principles having regard to the facts and circumstances of each case and the following factors are to be taken into consideration while considering an application for bail: (i) the nature of accusation and the severity of the punishment and the nature of the materials relied upon by the prosecution; (ii) reasonable apprehension of tampering with the witnesses and threat to the complainant or the witnesses; (iii) reasonable possibility of securing the presence of the accused at the time of trial or the likelihood of his abscondence; (iv) character behaviour and standing of the accused and the circumstances which are peculiar to the accused; (v) larger interest of the public or the State and similar other considerations are required to be considered. [6.0] I have heard the learned advocates appearing on behalf of the respective parties and perused the investigation papers. Following aspects have been considered: (1) investigation is over and charge-sheet is filed; (2) None of the offence alleged is punishable with life sentence or death penalty; (3) Applicant is behind the bar since 29.05.2026; (4) The allegation against the present applicant is that, by R/CR.MA/22592/2026 ORDER DATED: 28/09/2026 (GJHC240702182026) hatching a criminal conspiracy with the co-accused, they came on a two-wheeler without a number plate and attempted to snatch the bag of the complainant, who was working with an Angadia firm and was carrying valuables and muddamal worth Rs.1 crore and 46 lakhs and bag was snatched by the accused. In this regard, a complaint was filed. Muddamal is worth Rs.1,35,00,000/-, which has been recovered; (5) The applicant is having five past antecedents and in four of the same, he is acquitted and only one is pending for which the applicant is presumed to be innocent till proven guilty; (6) Obviously commencement and conclusion of trial will take its own time; (7) Co-accused having similar role is considered by ths Court and hence, considering the decision rendered in case of Rameshbhai Batubhai Dabhi vs. State of Gujarat reported in (1999) 3 GLR 1150, on the ground of parity, the present application is required to be considered. [7.1] This Court has also taken into consideration the law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Sanjay Chandra vs. Central Bureau of Investigation reported in [2012]1 SCC 40 as well as in the case of Gudikanti Narasimhulu And Ors. vs. Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh reported in (1978)1 SCC 240. Obviously, the conclusion of trial will take time and keeping the accused behind the bars is nothing but amounts to pre-trial conviction and therefore, considering the celebrated principle of bail jurisprudence is that “bail is a rule and jail is exception” as well as the concept of personal liberty guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution of India, present application deserves consideration. R/CR.MA/22592/2026 ORDER DATED: 28/09/2026 (GJHC240702182026) [8.0] In the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the nature of the allegations made against the applicant in the FIR, without discussing the evidence in detail, prima facie, this Court is of the opinion that this is a fit case to exercise the discretion and enlarge the applicant on regular bail. Hence, the present application is allowed. The applicant is ordered to be released on regular bail in connection with FIR being C.R.No.11821011260972 of 2026 registered with Dahod “A” Division Police Station, Dahod, on executing a personal bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty-five Thousand only) with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court and subject to the conditions that he shall; (a) not take undue advantage of liberty or misuse liberty; (b) not act in a manner injurious to the interest of the prosecution & shall not obstruct or hamper the police investigation and shall not to play mischief with the evidence collected or yet to be collected by the police; (c) surrender passport, if any, to the Trial Court within a week; (d) not leave State of Gujarat without prior permission of the Trial Court concerned; (e) mark presence before the concerned Police Station once a month for a period of six months between 11.00 a.m. to 2.00 pm; (f) furnish the Aadhaar card, email ID/present address of his residence to the Investigating Officer and also to the Court at the time of execution of the bond and shall not change the residence/contact number without prior R/CR.MA/22592/2026 ORDER DATED: 28/09/2026 (GJHC240702182026) permission of Trial Court; [9.0] The authorities will release the applicant only if he is not required in connection with any other offence for the time being. If breach of any of the above conditions is committed, the Sessions Judge concerned will be free to issue warrant or take appropriate action in the matter. [10.0] Bail bond to be executed before the lower Court having jurisdiction to try the case. It will be open for the concerned Court to delete, modify and/or relax any of the above conditions, in accordance with law. [11.0] At the trial, the trial Court shall not be influenced by the observations of preliminary nature qua the evidence at this stage made by this Court while enlarging the applicant on bail. [12.0] Rule is made absolute to the aforesaid extent. Direct service is permitted. (HASMUKH D. SUTHAR,J) ILA Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge. Digitally signed by: ILA PRAFULKUMAR PATEL(HC00194), Principal Pvt Secretary, at High Court of Gujarat on 28/09/2026 18:18:31