Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 391 (UTT)

MADARSA QADRIA MAZHARUL ULOOM v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPMS/489/2026 · 2026-03-12

Pankaj Purohit

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:UHC:766 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPMS No.489 of 2026 Madarsa Qadira Mazharul Uloom and another …………Petitioners Vs. State of Uttarakhand and others ……….Respondents Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Imran Ali Khan, learned counsel for the petitioner, through video conferencing. 2. Mr. Suyash Pant, learned S.C. for the State. 3. This writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, whereby the petitioner has sought a writ of mandamus to permanently unseal the premises of the petitioner’s Maktab on his giving an undertaking to the respondent-Authority that in future petitioner will not operate Maktab in-question without due recognition by the State under the rules and regulations. 4. Misc. Application (IA No.2 of 2026) is allowed. Supplementary affidavit filed on behalf of the petitioner is taken on record. 5. A supplementary affidavit has been filed by the petitioner stating therein that the petitioner is ready to give an affidavit in compliance of the judgment and order dated 26.08.2025, passed in WPMS No.835 of 2025, Madarsa Inamul Ulum Society Vs. State of Uttarakhand and others, and batch of writ petitions, but the language is not clear, therefore, it is provided that the petitioner shall give an undertaking in the form of a notarized affidavit to 2026:UHC:766 the competent authority that the building in- question shall not be used as Madarsa until and unless the requisite permission is taken from the Competent Authority in the State Government. 6. Accordingly writ petition stands disposed of in light of aforesaid judgment and order. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 12.03.2026 SK