SOHEB AKHTAR ALIAS DHULU ALLIAS SOHAB ALLIAS SOHEB AKHTAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./839/2026 · 2026-03-09
Gautam Kumar Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 391 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 391 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:6116 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 839 of 2026
------ Soheb Akhtar @ Dhulu @ Sohab Akhtar @ Soheb Aktar, S/o Jiyaul Pagla @ Jiyaul Shekh, R/o Village- Jankinagar, PO- Pakur, PS- Pakur (Muffasil), District- Pakur, Jharkhand.
.... .... …. Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand
.... .... .... Opposite Party
………..
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GAUTAM KUMAR CHOUDHARY
………..
For the Petitioner : Mr. R. S. Mazumdar, Sr. Advocate Mr. Yuvraj Singh, Advocate
For the State
: Mr. Vijoy Kr. Sinha, APP
------
Order No.02 / Dated : 09.03.2026.
Heard both the sides.
The petitioner, above-named, who is in custody in connection with Pakur (Town) P.S. Case No. 288 of 2025 for the offence registered under Sections 25(1-B) (a), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act, has prayed for regular bail.
It is submitted by the learned Sr. counsel on behalf of petitioner that nothing has been seized from the conscious physical possession of this petitioner and allegedly one country-made pistol and cartridge had been seized on the basis of disclosure statement made in Pakur (Town) P.S. Case No.275 of 2025 from an abandoned place near the bush.
It is further submitted that one similarly situated co-accused has already been enlarged on bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in B.A. No.840 of 2026.
Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the prayer for bail.
Under the circumstances, the above-named petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/-(Twenty- Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Court below.
(Gautam Kumar Choudhary, J.) Sandeep/
Uploaded