1 CGHC010391802026 2026:CGHC:43650-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 5149 of 2026 Y.G. Nandeshwar S/o G.D. Nandeshwar Aged About 69 Years Working As B Class Government Civil Contractor, R/o H.N. 1030, Bhartiya Nagar, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Public Work Department, Einc Pwd, Nirman Bhawan, North Block, Sec-19, Nawa Raipur, Atal Nagar, Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Engineer In Chief Public Work Department, Atal Nagar Nawa Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Chief Engineer Public Work Department, Bilaspur Zone, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. 4 - Superintending Engineer Public Work Department, Circle Bilaspur, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. 5 - Sub Divisional Officer Public Work Department, Division Mungeli, Distt. Mungeli, Chhattisgarh. 6 - Executive Engineer Public Work Department, Division Mungeli, Mungeli, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Umakant Singh Chandel, Advocate and Mr. Siddhant Tiwari, Advocate For Respondent/State : Mr. Rahul Tamaskar, Government Advocate RAHUL DEWANGAN Digitally signed by RAHUL DEWANGAN 2 Hon'ble Shri Krushna Ram Mohapatra , Chief Justice and Hon'ble Shri Santosh Sharma , Judge Order on Board Per Krushna Ram Mohapatra , C.J. 08/10/2026 1. Petitioner, in this writ petition, prays for the following reliefs : 10.1 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to directing the respondents to forthwith release the bonus/incentive payable to the petitioner for early completion of the construction work under the work order dated 12.09.2023. 10.2 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct to decide the pending representation of the petitioner within a time- bound manner. 10.3 Any other relief, which this Hon'ble Court, may deem fit and proper, in the facts and circumstances of the case. 10.4 Cost of the petition. 2. In course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has a remedy of arbitration under Clause 28 of the agreement at Annexure P-1. He, therefore, prays for withdrawal of the writ petition to seek remedy under Clause 28 of the agreement at Annexure P-1. 3. Mr. Tamaskar, learned Government Advocate, does not have any objection to such prayer. 3 4. Hence, the writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn with an observation that the petitioner may, if so advised, work out his remedy under Clause 28 of the agreement at Annexure P-1. Sd/- Sd/- (Santosh Sharma) (Krushna Ram Mohapatra) Judge Chief Justice Rahul Dewangan