MOHAMMAD SALIM ROKADIYA v. MOHAMMAD AARIF ROKADIYA
WP227/401/2025 · 2026-10-07
Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 39018 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 39018 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
CGHC010164262025
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP227 No. 401 of 2025 1 - Mohammad Salim Rokadiya S/o Mohammad Daud Rokadiya Aged About 49 Years R/o Salhewarpara, Near Old Bones Godown, Dhamtari, District Dhamtari Chhattisgarh
... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Mohammad Aarif Rokadiya S/o Mohammad Daud Rokadiya Aged About 46 Years R/o Akash Ganga Colony, House No. 48, Rudri Road, Dhamtari, District Dhamtari Chhattisgarh 2 - Shahnaz Bano W/o Salim Rokadiya Aged About 45 Years R/o Salhewarpara, Near Old Bones Godown, Dhamtari, District Dhamtari Chhattisgarh (Respondent/defendant No. 2) 3 - Ayasha Bano W/o Mohammad Daud Rokadiya Aged About 67 Years R/o Salhewarpara, Near Old Bones Godown, Dhamtari, District Dhamtari Chhattisgarh (Respondent/defendant No. 3) 4 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Collector, Balod, District Balod Chhattisgarh (Respondent/defendant No. 4)
... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mayank Gupta, Advocate For Respondent No. 1 : Mr. H.B. Agrawal, Sr. Advocate along with Ms. A. Sandhya Rao, Advocate SAGRIKA AGRAWAL Digitally signed by SAGRIKA AGRAWAL Date: 2026.10.09 10:13:54 +0530
2 Hon’ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J
Order on Board 08.10.2026
1.
Learned counsel appearing for the parties would submit that the parties have entered into compromise and now the petitioner does not want to press the present petition further.
2. In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the present writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge sagrika