[2026:RJ-JP:15457] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1304/2006 Krishna Kumar S/o Hanuman Prasad, Resident Of Bansur, Tehsil Bansur District Alwar. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Revenue Department, Government Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. District Collector, Alwar 3. Tehsildar Tehsil Bansur, District Alwar. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Aayush Goyal with Mr. Lucky Sharma for Mr. Aditya Kiran Mathur For Respondent(s) : Mr. V.D. Gathala, AGC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUROOP SINGHI Order 13/04/2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the writ petitioner on the merits of the writ petition. 2. A perusal of the writ petition reveals that the same has been filed challenging the notice dated 21.01.2006 (Annexure-1) issued to the petitioner under Section 91 of the Rajasthan Land Revenue Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act of 1956”). 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that reply to the said notice was duly filed by the petitioner wherein all the objections including the objection with respect to the jurisdiction of the authority for issuance of the said notice were raised, however, no concrete action was taken by the authorities in respect of the same. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that this Court vide its interim order dated 21.02.2006 was pleased to direct the respondents to not to dispossess the petitioner. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner further prays that the respondents may be directed to decide the proceedings under [2026:RJ-JP:15457] (2 of 2) [CW-1304/2006] Section 91 of the Act of 1956 in accordance with law in a time bound manner. 6. Taking note of the fact that the writ petition has been filed challenging the notice issued under Section 91 of the Act of 1956 to which reply has already been filed by the petitioner and also the fact that an interim order was passed by this Court on 21.02.2006, it would be in fitness of things to dispose of the writ petition with directions to the respondent No.3 to conclude the proceedings under Section 91 of the Act of 1956, within a period of six weeks from today, strictly in accordance with law after granting due opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and considering the reply filed by the petitioner. As considerable time has passed, the petitioner would also be at liberty to file additional submissions, if so advised, within a period of fifteen days from today. 7. Considering the fact that an interim order was passed by this Court on 21.02.2006, the said interim order would continue till the conclusion of the proceedings under Section 91 of the Act of 1956 and for further period of ten days thereafter. 8. With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition is disposed of. 9. Needless to say that in case any adverse order is passed against the petitioner, the petitioner shall be at liberty to take appropriate remedy as available under the law. 10. Pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. (ANUROOP SINGHI),J DANISH USMANI /C2