Shri Bhabani Sarkar v. The State of Tripura and 3 others
WP(C)/145/2026 · 2026-03-25
S Datta Purkayastha
Writ Petition (Civil)body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 39 (TRI) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 39 (TRI) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA AGARTALA
WP(C)No.145 of 2026
Shri Bhabani Sarkar, S/O- Late Prangopal Sarkar, Resident of Hrishi Arbinda Palli, Amarpur, P.S- Birganj, District- Gomati, Tripura, PIN - 799101
….Petitioner(s) Versus 1.The State of Tripura represented by the Secretary, Department of Panchayat, Government of Tripura, New Secretariat Complex, Agartala, West Tripura. 2.The Director of Panchayat, Government of Tripura, Agartala, West Tripura.
3.The District Magistrate and Collector, Gomati District, Udaipur, Tripura.
4.The Block Development Officer, Amarpur Rural Development Block, Gomati District, Tripura.
….Respondent(s)
For Petitioner(s)
: Mr. Samar Das, Advocate.
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Dipankar Sarma, Addl.GA.
Date of hearing and : 25.03.2026 Dlivery of Judgment/
Order
Whether fit for reporting :
=B=E=F=O=R=E= HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S. DATTA PURKAYASTHA
Judgment and order (Oral)
Heard Ld. Counsel of both sides.
[2]
With consent of both sides, this writ petition is being
disposed of as agreed by the parties at this motion stage.
[3]
The petitioner went on superannuation as Panchayat Supervisor on attaining the age of 60 years on 30.11.2025. But his post retiral benefits have not been released to him till date. In this Yes No
regard he submitted a representation on 17.02.2026 (Annexure-3) to Respondent No.4, but same has also not been responded by the respondents despite one month has elapsed.
[4]
Ld. Counsel, Mr. Samar Das, for the petitioner submits that the writ petition may be disposed of with a direction to the respondents to dispose of said representation in a time bound manner.
[5]
Ld. Addl. GA, Mr. D. Sarma, representing all the respondents has not opposed the same.
[6]
In view of above, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to dispose of the representation dated 17.02.2026 (Annexure-3) of the petitioner in accordance with law within 1(one) month of receipt of the copy of this Judgment.
With such direction, the writ petition is disposed of.
Interim Application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of accordingly.
JUDGE
Saikat Sarma MUNNA SAHA Digitally signed by MUNNA SAHA Date: 2026.03.26 15:25:22 +05'30'