RAEES S/O JUMMA KHAN v. MOHD. HASAN S/O JUMMA KHAN
CMA/406/2023 · 2026-02-24
Anoop Kumar Dhand
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3899 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3899 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:8519] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No.406/2023 Raees S/o Jumma Khan, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Saadat Ganj, Kalipaltan, Tehsil And Distt. Tonk (Raj.) ----Appellant Versus
1. Mohd. Hasan S/o Jumma Khan, R/o Saadat Ganj, Kalipaltan, Tehsil And Distt. Tonk (Raj.) (Vehicle Driver Vehicle No. Rj-26-Sa-2024)
2. Mohd. Hussain S/o Basheer Mohd., R/o Moti Bagh, Talaab Ki Paal, Tehsil And Distt. Tonk (Raj.) (Vehicle Owner Vehicle No Rj-26-Sa-2024)
3. United India Insurance Company Ltd., Branch Office Near Nizaam Factory, Subhash Market, Tonk (Raj.) ----Respondents For Appellant(s) : Mr. Praveen Kumar Jain with Mr. Bhadar Singh For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rahul Lodha with Mr. Shubham Gupta JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND
Order 24/02/2026
1. By way of filing the instant appeal, a challenge has been led to the impugned judgment dated 24.11.2022 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Tonk (for short “the Tribunal”) by which the claim petition has been partly allowed and the respondents have been directed to pay a compensation of Rs.1,53,606/- to the claimant.
2. Aggrieved by the aforesaid, the appellant-claimant (for short
“the claimant”) has approached this Court seeking further enhancement of the amount of compensation.
[2026:RJ-JP:8519] (2 of 4) [CMA-406/2023]
3.
Learned counsel for the claimant submits that the injured met with an accident on 17.08.2018 and the same was caused by the driver of the motorcycle bearing registration No.RJ-26- SA-2024 while driving the said offending vehicle in a rash and negligent manner. Learned counsel submits that because of the aforesaid accident, the injured has suffered several injuries on various parts of his body, which has resulted in 11% permanent disability. Learned counsel submits that not a single penny under the head of future prospects has been granted. He submits that, at the time of accident, the age of the claimant was 35 years. He submits that even under the other heads, i.e., mental agony, a petty amount of Rs.5,000/- only has been awarded, while the claimant has remained hospitalized for the period of five days and as per the disability certificate, there is around 30% restriction in the movement of his right knee, hence, under these circumstances, the impugned award needs to be suitably enhanced.
4. Per contra, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent-Insurance Company opposed the arguments raised by
learned counsel for the claimant and submitted that after considering overall facts and circumstances of the case, which have been available on the record, an appropriate amount of compensation has been awarded by the Tribunal and needs no further interference of this Court and the appeal is liable to be rejected. 5. Heard and considered the submissions made at the Bar and perused the material available on the record. [2026:RJ-JP:8519] (3 of 4) [CMA-406/2023]
6. Perusal of the record indicates that the appellant has met with an accident and suffered several injuries on various parts of his body, which has resulted in 11% permanent disability. 7. This fact is not in dispute that as per the disability certificate issued by three members of the Medical Board, there is 30% restriction in the movement of his right knee and this fact is also not in dispute that the claimant has remained hospitalized for a period of five days and not a single penny under the head of future prospects has been awarded to the claimant. 8. Considering overall facts and circumstances of the case, the impugned award is modified and the claimant is entitled to get the following amount of compensation:- Monthly Income (Add 40% towards future prospects) 213 x 30 + 213 x 30 x 40/100 = Rs. 8946/- Annual Income 8946 x 12 = Rs.1,07,352/- Multiplier to be applied 16 1,07,352 x 16 = Rs.17,17,632/- For Loss of Income (owing to 11% permanent disability) 17,17,632 x 11/100 = Rs.1,88,939.52/- Contributory Negligence 10% 1,88,939.52 - 1,88,939.52 x 10/100 = Rs. 1,70,045.56p For Nutritious food Rs.5000/- For Pain & Suffering and Mental Agony Rs.25,000/- For Medical Bills Rs.8578/- For Transportation Rs.5000/- Total Compensation Awardable 2,13,623.56p Less amount awarded by the Tribunal Rs. 1,53,606/- Enhanced
amount
of compensation Rs.60,017.56p
[2026:RJ-JP:8519] (4 of 4) [CMA-406/2023]
9. Thus, in the facts and circumstances, an amount of Rs.60,017.56p is required to be enhanced in the present case and the respondent-Insurance Company is directed to pay the enhanced amount in addition to the amount already awarded by the Tribunal under the judgment and award dated 24.11.2022 in the savings bank account of the claimant, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of the certified copy of this order.
Needless to say, the enhanced amount shall carry interest @ 6% per annum from the date of filing of the claim petition, till the actual payment is made. 10. With the aforesaid observations, the appeal stands disposed of. All pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Karan/24