Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3899 (CAL)

SATHI MAJUMDER v. HABIBUR RAHAMAN AND ORS

MAT/438/2026 · 2026-03-31

Partha Sarathi Chatterjee, Tapabrata Chakraborty

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

4 31.03.2026 Ct No.11 rrc MAT 438 of 2026 with IA No. CAN 2 of 2026 (Sathi Majumder Vs. Habibur Rahaman & Ors.) Mr. Debabrata Saha Roy, Sr. Adv. Mr. Pingal Bhattacharyya Mr. Subhankar Das … For the appellant Mr. Amal Sen, AAG Mr. Parikshit Goswami ….. For the State respondents Mr. Arijit Dey ….. For the respondent no. 1/ writ petitioner In course of hearing, it was submitted that, acting upon the order under appeal, a hearing was conducted by the District Controller, and the appellant had participated in the said hearing. In view of such facts, since the appellant has already accepted the order and participated in the hearing conducted by the District Controller, no interference is called for in the present appeal. Accordingly, the appeal and its connected application are dismissed. There shall, however, be no order as to costs. All parties shall act on the server copies of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this court. (Partha Sarathi Chatterjee, J.) (Tapabrata Chakraborty, J.)