Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3897 (RAJ)

RAMPRATAP S/O MATADEEN v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/2598/2026 · 2026-04-10

Sameer Jain

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:15133] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 2nd Bail Application No. 2598/2026 Rampratap S/o Matadeen, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Mahtala, Police Station Bansoor District Alwar (Raj.) (Presently Confined In District Jail, Deeg). ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajveer Singh Gurjar For Respondent(s) : Mr. M. S. Shekhawat, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 10/04/2026 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 on behalf of the accused-applicant. The accused-applicant was arrested in connection with FIR No. 161/2023 registered at Police Station Khoh, District Bharatpur for the offence(s) under Sections 364, 302, 201, and 120-B of the IPC. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-applicant has submitted that the applicant is aged about 34 years and has been falsely implicated in the present matter solely on the basis of suspicion. It is submitted that the applicant has been in custody for a period of approximately two and a half years. Learned counsel further submits that there is a material change in the circumstances of the case, as the statements of the material eyewitnesses have already been recorded before the learned Trial Court, and the [2026:RJ-JP:15133] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-2598/2026] same is not supportive of the case of the prosecution, therefore, the concession of bail should be granted to the applicant. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the instant bail application. It is submitted that the allegations levelled against the applicant pertain to the heinous offences of kidnapping and murder. 4. Having heard the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties, upon an assiduous perusal of the material available on record, considering the extreme gravity and heinous nature of the alleged offences, taking note of the fact that there is no material change in the circumstances of the case since the dismissal of the previous bail application, and looking to the overall facts and circumstances of the case but without commenting on the merits/demerits of the case, this Court is not inclined to allow the bail application of the accused-applicant. 5. Accordingly, the instant bail application filed under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 stands dismissed. (SAMEER JAIN),J Pooja /226