08.09.2026 Serial no. 15 [G.S.Das] Assistant Registrar (Court) CRM (M) 1789 of 2026 In re : An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 in connection with Baishnabnagar PS Case No. 193 of 2026 dated 22.02.2026 u/s 179/180 and 61(2) of the BNS. -And- In the matter of : Mortalim Sk @ Tinku … Petitioner(s) Mr. S. Mondl Mr. M. Saha Mr. S. Das … for the Petitioner(s) Mr. Sagar Saha Ms. Nayana Mukhopadhyay … for the State-respondent(s) Learned advocate for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been detained in custody since 22.02.2026. Although, there has been recovery of FICN to the tune of Rs. 1,44,000/- but there has been no recovery from the present petitioner. Learned advocate added that there is neither any CDR nor any money trail is available so far as the present petitioner is concerned. Learned advocate emphasizes that the present petitioner has been detained in custody only on the basis of statement of a co-accused. Learned advocate for the State opposes the prayer for bail. I have taken into account the materials appearing in the case diary and prima facie I am of the view that the only 2 material appearing against the present petitioner is the statement of the co-accused. Having considered the same, I am inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Hence, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is Allowed. Accordingly, the petitioner viz, Mortalim Sk @ Tinku shall be released on bail upon furnishing bond of Rs.20,000/-(Rupees Twenty Thousand only), with two sureties of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the Learned CJM, Malda. If on bail, the petitioner shall also make himself physically available on each and every date so fixed by the learned court in seisin of the case and shall not leave the district of Malda without prior permission of the learned court in seisin of the case. Accordingly, CRM (M) 1789 of 2026 is allowed. Pending application(s), if any, is also disposed of. Memo of evidence submitted be kept with the record. Parties to act on a server copy of this order duly collected from the official website of the Hon’ble High Court, Calcutta. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties subject to compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.) 3