MONIRUL SK v. PRAMILA MURMU, PRADHAN, SULTANPUR GRAM PANCHAYAT
WPCRC/55/2026 · 2026-09-07
Bivas Pattanayak
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 38950 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 38950 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
September 7, 2026 (13) (M/L) ARDR WPCRC 55 of 2026 In WPA 11751 of 2024
Monirul Sk Vs. Pramila Murmu
Mr. Jyoti Prakash Chatterjee, Ms. Sneha Sanyal, …for the applicant/petitioner. Mr. Atanu Biswas, Mr. Mrinal Saha, ..for the respondent no.6/alleged contemnor.
1. Supplementary affidavit of compliance filed by the respondent no.6/alleged contemnor is taken on record.
2. Mr. Atanu Biswas, learned Advocate for the alleged contemnor submits that pursuant to the order dated 21st August, 2026 the alleged contemnor has rectified the previous resolution and has already forwarded the fact of illegal unauthorised construction to the Sub-Divisional Officer, Kalna.
3. Mr. Jyoti Prakash Chakraborty, learned Advocate for the applicant/petitioner concedes the same.
4. In view of the above, the contempt application being WPCRC 55 of 2026 stands disposed of.
5. Rule is discharged.
6. Personal appearance of the alleged contemnor is dispensed with.
7. Urgent certified website copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.
(Bivas Pattanayak, J.)