Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 38940 (CAL)

MUJIT GAYEN AND ANR. v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

WPA/22367/2026 · 2026-09-08

Saugata Bhattacharyya

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

23. 23. 08.09.2026 (D/L) (D/L) CT. NO. 05 CT. NO. 05 (ARPAN-A.R.CT.) In The High Court at Calcutta CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT Jurisdiction (Appellate Side) W.P.A. 22367 OF 2026 MUJIT GAYEN AND ANOTHER VS. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND OTHERS …………… Mr. Nirmalendu Bera, Adv. Ms. Gopa Das, Adv. …For Petitioners Mr. Rachit Lakhmani, Adv. Mr. Parashar Baidya, Adv. …For State 1. Affidavit-of-service filed on behalf of petitioners is taken on record. 2. In spite of service of notice private respondents are not represented but State respondents are represented by learned advocates. 3. It is submitted by learned advocate representing State respondents that based on complaint lodged by petitioners FIR is registered being Jibantala P.S. Case no.813/ 2026 dated 6th August, 2026. 4. In view of steps taken by the concerned police authority by registering FIR, no further order need be passed on this writ petition. 5. Writ petition stands disposed of. 6. A communication dated 31st August, 2026 of Officer- in-Charge, Jibantala Police Station is filed today and same is taken on record. Copy of the said communication dated 31st August, 2026 is handed over to the learned advocate representing petitioners. 7. Parties to act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this court. (SAUGATA BHATTACHARYYA, J.)