Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3894 (JHR)

SWEETY VARSHA BAKHLA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

WPC/319/2026 · 2026-03-25

Sri Ananda Sen

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:8528 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No. 319 of 2026 1. Sweety Varsha Bakhla, daughter of Khushdil Bakhla, resident of village Bhandaria, P.O nawada, P.S. Manhugain, District- Garhwa,Jharkhand. 2. Madhu Kumari, daughter of Rajeev Ranjan, at village- Putur, P.O Kathar Kala, P.S. Dhurki, District- Garhwa, Jharkhand. ….Petitioner(s) Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand. 2. The Secretary, School Education and Literacy Department, Govt. of Jharkhand, at Project Building, Dhurwa, Ranchi. 3. The Director, Secondary Education, School Education and Literacy Department, Govt. of Jharkhand, Govt. of Jharkhand, at Project Building, Dhurwa, Ranchi. 4. The Director, Primary Education, School Education and Literacy Department, Govt. of Jharkhand, Govt. of Jharkhand, at Project Building, Dhurwa, Ranchi. 5. Jharkhand Staff Selection Commission, through its Chairman, office at Chaibagan Gali, Kali Nagar, Namkum, Ranchi, Jharkhand. 6. The Examination Controller, Jharkhand Staff Selection Commission, office at Chaibagan Gali, Kali Nagar, Namkum, Ranchi, Jharkhand ….Respondent(s) ------- CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the petitioner(s): Mr. Shubham Mishra, Advocate For the State: A.C. to AG. For JSSC: M/s Sanjoy Piprawall, Jay Prakash, Prince Kumar and Rakesh Ranjan, Advocates. ------ 03/25.03.2026: Heard the parties. 2. In this writ petition, the petitioners have prayed for direction upon the respondents to appoint them on the post of Assistant Teacher in Class-VI to Class-VIII. 3. During course of arguments, the parties have admitted that petitioner No. 2 (Madhu Kumari) has been declared successful. That being so, it is expected that the Jharkhand Staff Selection Commission will recommend the name of the petitioner immediately, who thereafter will be issued appointment letter, if the petitioner is otherwise found eligible. 4. So far as petitioner No. 1 (Sweety Varsha Bakhla) is concerned, it is submitted that this petitioner in her category and subject, has obtained lesser marks than the last selected candidate. 5. In that view, no relief can be granted to this petitioner. -1- 6. However, since the appointment process is continuing, in future, if it is found that any person obtaining lesser marks than the petitioner in the subject and the category, the liberty is given to the petitioner to approach Jharkhand Staff Selection Commission for appropriate relief(s). 7. Accordingly, this writ petition stands disposed of. 25th March, 2026 (ANANDA SEN, J.) Anu/-Cp2. -2-