Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 38935 (CHH)

SWARAJ BAGHEL v. SMT. MANORAMA BAGHEL

WP227/986/2025 · 2026-10-08

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 CGHC010407592025 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP227 No. 986 of 2025 1 - Swaraj Baghel S/o Late Shri Banshilal Baghel Aged About 78 Years R/o Village Belodi, Tehsil Patan, District Durg C.G. (Plaintiff No. 1) 2 - Azad Baghel S/o Late Shri Banshilal Baghel Aged About 76 Years R/o Village Belodi, Tehsil Patan, District Durg C.G. (Plaintiff No. 2) 3 - Yuvraj Baghel S/o Late Shri Ramkrishna Baghel Aged About 55 Years R/o Village Belodi, Tehsil Patan, District Durg C.G. (Plaintiff No. 3) 4 - Anil Kumar S/o Late Shri Mahesh Ram Baghel Aged About 50 Years R/o Village Belodi, Tehsil Patan, District Durg C.G. (Plaintiff No. 4) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Smt. Manorama Baghel W/o Late Shri Prahlad Baghel Aged About 73 Years R/o 43/833 Hanuman Nagar, Near Goswami Kirana Stores, Post Sundernagar, Tehsil And District Raipur C.G.(Defendant No. 1) 2 - Shri Bhupendra Singh, Naib Tehsildar, Patan, District Durg C.G.M (Defendant No. 2) 3 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Collector, District Durg C.G. ... Respondent(s) (Cause title taken from CIS) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Harshmander Rastogi, Advocate For Respondent No.1 For State : : Ms. Poonam Gilurkar, Advocate Mr. Atanu Ghosh, Dy. G.A. SAGRIKA AGRAWAL Digitally signed by SAGRIKA AGRAWAL Date: 2026.10.09 18:45:32 +0530 2 Hon’ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J Order on Board 09.10.2026 1. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the civil suit pending before the learned trial Court has been withdraw by the petitioner and fresh civil suit has been filed. Therefore, the present writ petition which has been arising out of the earlier suit is now become infructuous. 2. In view of the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioners, which is not opposed by the learned counsel for the respective respondents, the present writ petition is disposed of as having become infructous. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge sagrika