Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 38931 (CAL)

SWARUP DEY @ SWARUP DE AND ORS. v. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

WPA/25110/2025 · 2026-09-08

Rishad Medora

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

08.09.2026 Item No. 03 Court No.22. S. De 266462 WPA 25110 of 2025 Swarup Dey @ Swarup De & Ors. Vs. Union of India & Ors. Mr. Sourov Mondal, Mr. Arijit Bhuiya, Mr. Rony Mondal, Mr. Debarghyo Sil, …for the petitioners. Mr. Suchismita Ghosh, Ms. A. Banerjee, …for the respondent nos.4 and 5. Mr. Madhu Jana, Mr. Vinayak Choubey, …for the State. 1. The petitioners are represented today. 2. The respondent nos. 4 and 5 are also represented. 3. The State is also represented. 4. The learned advocate representing the petitioners submits that he has instructions from his client not to proceed with the matter any further. 5. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 6. Since no affidavit-in-opposition has been called for, the allegations made in the writ petition are deemed not to have been admitted by the respondents. 7. All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. 2 8. Urgent Photostat certified copy of the order, if applied for, be given to the parties upon compliance with the requisite formalities. 9. No order as to costs. (Rishad Medora, J.)