Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 38926 (CAL)

TANMAY GHOSH v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

WPA/12338/2026 · 2026-09-03

Bivas Pattanayak

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

03.09.2026 Sl. No.32 Ct. No.14 Rohit (A.R.Court) IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE W.P.A. No. 12338 of 2026 Tanmay Ghosh Versus The State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Sougata Mitra Ms. Soma Chakraborty Mr. Subhadeep Maitra …for the Petitioner. Mr. Brijendra Pratap Singh Mr. Sourav Sengupta …for the State. 1. Supplementary affidavit filed by the petitioner is taken on record. Affidavit-of-service is also taken on record. 2. Learned Advocate for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is aggrieved by the order passed the authority concerned rejecting the prayer of the petitioner seeking transfer. However, inadvertently no challenge has been made to the aforesaid order passed by the authority. On such ground he seeks to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file afresh. 3. In view of the above submission, the writ petition being WPA 12338 of 2026 stands dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file afresh. 4. All connected applications, if any, stand disposed of. 5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. 6. Urgent Photostat certified copy of the order, if applied for, be given to the parties on compliance of all necessary legal formalities. (Bivas Pattanayak, J.)