- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010292972021 NC: 2026:KHC:48360 WP No. 612 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 612 OF 2022 (LA-KHB) BETWEEN: 1. SMT CHANDRAMMA W/O LATE SOMANNA, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, 2. SMT SUMITHRA S @ DHAKSHAYANI S D/O LATE SOMANNA, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, 3. SRI RAMU S @ RAMAIAH S. S/O LATE SOMANNA, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, 3. SRI NAGARAJ S @ RAJU S S/O LATE SOMANNA, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, ALL ARE RESIDING AT ALLALASANDRA VILLAGE, YELAHANKA HOBLI, GKVK POST, BENGALURU NORTH TLAUK, BANGALURU 560065 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. MANJUNATH D M., ADVOCATE(ABSENT)) AND: Digitally signed by HEMALATHA J Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010292972021 NC: 2026:KHC:48360 WP No. 612 of 2022 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, M S BUILDING, BENGALURU 560001 2. HOUSING COMMISSIONER KARNATAKA HOUSING BOARD, CAUVERY BHAVAN, BENGALURU 560009 3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER KARNATAKA HOUSING BOARD, CAUVERY BHAVAN, BENGALURU 560009 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.B.J.ESHWARAPPA, AGA FOR R1 (MEMO OF APPEARANCE IS NOT FILED) SRI.V.N.MURTHY, ADVOCATE FOR R2 AND R3) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECTION DECLARING THE PRELIMINARY NOTIFICATION ANNEXURE-A, UNDER SECTION 4(1) DATED 06.04.1989 MADE IN NO.Ka gru ma, BHU SWA Vi 1/89-90 AND FINAL NOTIFICATION ANNEXURE-B UNDER SECTION 6(1) DATED 25.03.1991 MADE IN km E 310 Bhu Swa Be 90 AND ANNEXURE-C AWARD DATED 12.12.1998 PASSED BY THE RESPONDENTS ARE ILLEGAL AND CONTRARY TO LAW AND CONSEQUENTLY QUASHING THE SAME IN RESPECT OF LAND BEARING SY.NO.8/5 MEASURING 19 GUNTAS OF ALLALASANDRA VILLAGE, YELAHANKA HOBLI, BENGALURU NORTH, BENGALURU DISTRICT AND ETC. - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010292972021 NC: 2026:KHC:48360 WP No. 612 of 2022 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ ORAL ORDER There is no representation for the petitioners, though the petition is called twice in the day. 2. Even on the last date of hearing, there was no appearance for the petitioners. 3. Hence, the petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. Sd/- (R. NATARAJ) JUDGE BKN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 51