Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 38903 (CAL)

PRIYABRATA GANGOPADHYAY v. STATE BANK OF INDIA AND ANR.

WPA/22702/2026 · 2026-09-09

Reetobroto Kumar Mitra

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

08 09.09. 2026 Ct. No. 18 Ab IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE. WPA 22702 of 2026 Priyabrata Gangopadhyay Vs. State Bank of India and another. --------------- Mr. Sourav Prasanna Mukherjee, Mr. Arka Mondal. … for the petitioner. Mr. Subrata Kumar Sinha. … for the respondents. 1. The affidavit of service filed today is taken on record. 2. The petitioner’s grievance is that his representation in terms of the order dated January 30, 2026 has not been considered and addressed. 3. As the writ petition is taken up for hearing, the Bank has handed over a copy of such order on the representation of the petitioner. 4. Thus, nothing further remains to be adjudicated in the writ petition. 5. WPA 22702 of 2026 is disposed of on the afore- mentioned grounds. 6. There shall, however, be no order as to costs. 7. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties on priority basis. (Reetobroto Kumar Mitra, J.) 2