Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 38900 (MAD)

J.ALEX JAYA PANDIAN v. UNION OF INDIA

REV.APLW/108/2026 · 2026-06-19

N Senthilkumar, S M Subramaniam

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

REV.APLW No. 108 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 19-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N.SENTHILKUMAR REV.APLW No. 108 of 2026 J.Alex Jaya Pandian S/o J. John Kennedy, No.10, Vetri Nagar, 3rd Cross Street, West Tambaram, Chennai - 600 045. ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. Union of India Represented by The Air Officer - In - Charge, Personnel Civilian Air Headquarters, Vayubhavan,New Delhi – 110011. 2. Air Officer Commanding AOC in Charge,Headquarter, Training Command, Hebbeel, Bangalore. 3. Air Officer Commanding Air Force Station,Tambaram, Chennai - 600 047. 4. Nisha, Selected as Junior Artist Grade Ii, Service Through 3rd Respondent Air Officer Commanding, Air Force Station,Tambaram, Chennai - 600 047. ..Respondent(s) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis REV.APLW No. 108 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 Review Application filed under Order 47 Rule-1 r/w 114 of CPC to review the order in WP.No. 14746 of 2025 dated 25.04.2025. For Petitioner(s): Mr.M.Gnanasekar For Respondent(s): Mr.K.Ramamoorthy, Senior Panel Counselfor R1 to R3 ORDER (Order of the Court was made by S.M.Subramaniam J.) Review Application has been filed seeking review of the order of this Court dated 25.04.2025 in W.P.No.14746 of 2025. 2. The petitioner participated in the process of selection for appointment to the post of Junior Assistant Grade-II. He was not selected. After completion of selection, the petitioner questioned Clauses stipulated in the Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). 3. This Court has held that after participating in the process of selection, an unsuccessful candidate cannot question the rules of examination. Relying on the judgments of the Hon’ble Supreme Court, the Writ Petition came to be dismissed. The petitioner could not able to establish any error apparent warranting exercise of review powers by this Court. Thus, the Review Application stands dismissed. No costs. (S.M.S.,J.) (N.S.,J.) 19-06-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No vsi https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis REV.APLW No. 108 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 To 1. Union of India Represented by The Air Officer - In - Charge, Personnel Civilian Air Headquarters, Vayubhavan,New Delhi – 110011. 2.Air Officer Commanding AOC in Charge,Headquarter, Training Command, Hebbeel, Bangalore. 3.Air Officer Commanding Air Force Station,Tambaram, Chennai - 600 047. 4.Nisha, Selected as Junior Artist Grade Ii, Service Through 3rd Respondent Air Officer Commanding, Air Force Station,Tambaram, Chennai - 600 047 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis REV.APLW No. 108 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J. AND N.SENTHILKUMAR, J. VSI REV.APLW No. 108 of 2026 19-06-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis