Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3890 (BOM)

ANTARIKSH SINGH v. BRANCH MANAGER, KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK PVT. LTD. PANAJI BRANCH AND ANR

WPCR/215/2026 · 2026-08-18

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

901 WPCR 215 2026 Amrut IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.215 OF 2026 ANTARIKSH SINGH ... PETITIONER Versus BRANCH MANAGER, KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK PVT. LTD. PANAJI BRANCH AND ANR ... RESPONDENTS Mr. Kautuk Raikar and Mr. Digaj Bene, Advocates for the Petitioner. Mr. Omkar Kulkarni (Through V.C.), Advocate for Respondent No. 1. Mr. Gaurish Nagvekar, Additional Public Prosecutor for Respondent No. 2. CORAM:- S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J. DATED :- 18th August, 2026 P.C.: 1. Learned Advocate appearing for Respondent No.1- Bank, on instructions, states that the Petitioner's account has been defreezed. 2. Learned Advocate appearing for the Petitioner also received instructions from the Petitioner in this regard. In that view of the matter, the petition stands disposed of as withdrawn. S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J. 18th August, 2026 2026:BHC-GOA:1649 Signed by: TARI AMRUT NAGESH Designation: Private Secretary Date: 18/08/2026 18:44:42