Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Item No.7 08.09.2026 Court. No. 12
GB
MAT 1462 of 2026 With CAN 1 of 2026 With CAN 2 of 2026
Sambhu Pandit VS The Haldia Municipality & Ors.
Mr. Sukumar Ghosh, Ms. Moumita Ghosh … for the Appellant. Mr. S.M. Hassan, Ms. Anupama Yasmin … for the Municipality. Mr. Salil Kumar Maiti, Mr. Tanmoy Mukherjee, Ms. Dolan Samanta … for the Respondent No.6.
1. The order impugned was passed in CPAN 1068 of 2024. The appellant is not a party to the said proceeding. Hence, the appeal cannot be entertained in the absence of any application for leave to appeal.
2. However, upon considering the order impugned, we do not find that any portion of Her Lordship’s order has affected the construction of the appellant. The directions of Her Lordship in the contempt are against the District Magistrate.
3. Under such circumstances, the application for condonation of delay is dismissed as no useful purpose will be served by regularizing the appeal. Consequently, the appeal is also dismissed as time barred.
4. The appellant is at liberty to take appropriate steps before the appropriate Court.
(Shampa Sarkar, J.)
(Arjun Ray Mukherjee, J.)