1 CGHC010191532013 2026:CGHC:43681 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR SA No. 100 of 2013 • Parsudas Mahant S/o Late Vidyadas Mahant Aged About 62 Years R/o Vill. Sontarai, Post And P.S. And Tahsil. Sitapur, District Surguja (C.G.). ... Appellant(s) versus 1. Chamrudas And Ors S/o Manrakhan Das Aged About 37 Years R/o Rajauti, 2. Kamendra S/o Bodhan Aged About 41 Years R/o Latori, 3. Mukteshwar S/o Bodhan Aged About 37 Years R/o Latori, 4. Jagdish S/o Birsai Aged About 50 Years R/o Latori, 5. Budhan Ram S/o Brijmohan Aged About 62 Years R/o Latori, 6. Pandit Ram Prajapati S/o Hirasai Aged About 70 Years R/o Rajpuri, 7. Chamrudas S/o Ramdhan Aged About 60 Years R/o Jamgala, 8. Umeshdas S/o Bhagandas Aged About 58 Years R/o Jamgala, All Are R/o Post And P.S. Lakhanpur, Tah. Lakhanpur, District Surguja (C.G.). 9 Sitabai W/o Ramanand Aged About 56 Years, 10 Dayanand S/o Parmanand Aged About 43 Years, 11 - Satanand S/o Parmanand Aged About 45 Years, 12 - Satyanarayan S/o Parmanand Aged About 34 Years, 13 - Bimla Devi D/o Parmanand Aged About 38 Years, 14 - Shakuntala Devi D/o Parmanand Aged About 35 Years, CHANDRAKANT DEWANGAN Digitally signed by CHANDRAKANT DEWANGAN Date: 2026.10.09 12:12:09 +0530 2 15 Prabha Devi D/o Parmanand Aged About 32 Years, 16 Likhin Das S/o Shyam Das Aged About 30 Years, Respondents No. 9 to 16 Are R/o Village- Kalcha, Post And P.S. Surajpur, Tah. Surajpur, Distt. Surguja (Now Distt. Surajpur). 17 State Of Chhttisgarh S/o Thru- Collector Surguja, Ambikapur, Post And P.S. Ambikapur, Distt. Surguja (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Appellant (s) : For Respondent(s)/State : SB - Hon'ble Smt. Justice Sushma Sawant Judgment On Board 08.10.2026 1. This second appeal has been preferred against the impugned judgment and decree dated 14.12.2012 passed by learned 3rd Additional District Judge, Ambikapur, District – Surguja in Civil Appeal No.50-A/2012. 2. Even on the second call, none appeared on behalf of the appellant, nor was any representation made on his behalf. In these circumstances, this Court is left with no option but to dismiss the instant appeal for want of prosecution. 3. Accordingly, the instant appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Sushma Sawant) Judge Chandrakant