1 2026:CGHC:15271 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRA No. 371 of 2005 1 - De Singh S/o Shri Awadh Ram Satnami Aged About 27 Years R/o Baderbali, Police Station, Malkharauda, District- Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) 2 - (Died And Abated) Awadh Ram Satnami As Per Honble Court Order Dated- 10-03-2025. ... Appellants versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through - The Station House Officer, Police Station Malkhaurada, Distt. Janjgir-Champa (Chhattisgarh) ... Respondent For Appellants : Mr. Praveen Sharma, Advocate alongwith Mr. Chandra Prakash Choubey, Advocate For State : Ms. Prachi Singh, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas Order On Board 02.04.2026 1. This criminal appeal has been filed being aggrieved by the judgment dated 13.04.2005 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Sakti, District Janjgir Champa in Sessions Trial No. 22/2005 whereby the appellants have been convicted and sentenced in the following manner:- Conviction Sentence U/s 304 (Part II) of IPC : R.I. for 3 years and fine of Rs. 700/- (in default of payment of fine, R.I. for 3 months) BHUMIKA ANGARE Digitally signed by BHUMIKA ANGARE Date: 2026.04.02 15:26:53 +0530 2 U/s 451 of IPC : R.I. for 1 year and fine of Rs. 300/-, in default of payment of fine, further R.I. for 1 month. 2. In pursuance of direction given by this Court, the Dean, CIMS Bilaspur has submitted a report and from perusal of report it is quite vivid that no Nephrology treatment is required for the appellant. 3. Learned counsel for the appellant would submit that appellant No. 1 has already completed 03 years of incarceration period and after completion of jail sentence he has been released as evident from the report submitted by Jail Superintendent, Bilaspur. He would further submit that appellant No. 2- Awadh Ram Satnami has already expired on 15.07.2023. 4. Learned counsel for the State has not opposed the submission made by learned counsel for the State. 5. Considering the submission and fact that the appellant No. 1 has already been released from jail after completion of jail sentence as awarded by the learned trial Court, therefore, the instant appeal is liable to be disposed of. 6. Accordingly, the instant Criminal Appeal is disposed of as having become infructuous for the reason mentioned above. Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge Bhumika