Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 38886 (MAD)

Ms Rajkumar Theatre Pvt Ltd v. Aashirvad Cinemas Represented by its Proprietor M J Antony

C.S(COMM DIV)/144/2026 · 2026-06-18

K Kumaresh Babu

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

C.S(COMM DIV) No. 144 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 3 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 18-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU C.S(COMM DIV) No. 144 of 2026 O.A.No.488 of 2026 Ms Rajkumar Theatre Pvt Ltd Represented by its director Mr.Rajkumar Sethupathy, 7th Floor, Capital Towers, 555, Anna Salai, Chennai 600 018 ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. Aashirvad Cinemas Represented by its Proprietor M J Antony 59 1047 Valakuzhi, Krishna Swamy Road, Off Chittoor Road, Ernakulam 682 035. 2. Mr.Jeethu Joseph valiyakandathi Murtholoapuram PO, Elanji, Ernakulam 686 665. 3. Panorama Studio 22nd Floor, Lotus Signature, Veera Desai Road, Near Country Club, Shastri Nagar, Andheri West, Mumbai 400 102. ..Respondent(s) PRAYER:- Suit filed under Order IV Rule 1 of O.S.Rules r/w. Order VII Rule 1 of CPC and Section 7 of the Commercial Court Act, 2015 (Act 4 of 2016) r/w. Section 55 & 62 of the Copyright Act:- (a) To grant a permanent injunction restraining the defendants, their servants, agents, employees, assignees, licensees and every one claiming under or through the https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.S(COMM DIV) No. 144 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 3 defendants from infringing the Plaintiffs exclusive Copyright of remaking and exploiting the subject film Drishyam 3 in Telugu language, starring Mohanlal, Meena, etc., directed by Jeethu Joseph, by releasing the dubbed version of Drishyam 3, in Telugu, anywhere in the World (b) Directing the defendants to pay to the plaintiff the costs of this suit; (c) Granting such further or other reliefs as this Court may deem fit and proper under the circumstances of the case. For Petitioner(s): Mr.Murugan For M/s.Rugan And Arya For Respondent(s): Ms.Akshyaya Ramadurai for D1 JUDGMENT When the matter is taken up for the hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the plaintiff would submit that the matter had been settled out of Court between the parties and had also made an endorsement to that effect in the Court bundle. 2. Recording the same, the Suit stands dismissed as being settled out of the Court. No costs. Consequently, connected Original Application is also closed. 18-06-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No GBA https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.S(COMM DIV) No. 144 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 3 K.KUMARESH BABU, J. GBA C.S(COMM DIV) No. 144 of 2026 O.A.No.488 of 2026 18-06-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis