Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3888 (AP)

KALKIRI POTHAN PRATAP REDDY v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/16939/2026 · 2026-06-28

Harinath N

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Date of reserved for orders : Date of pronouncement : 29.06.2026 Date of uploading : 03.07.2026 APHC010315342026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] MONDAY, THE 29th DAY OF JUNE 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 16939/2026 Between: 1. KALKIRI POTHAN PRATAP REDDY, S/O LATE KALIKIRI NARAYANA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O D.NO. 25- 2-872,4TH STREET, SAVITHRI NAGAR, VEDAYAPALEM, NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY IT'S PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT VELAGAPUDI VILLAGE, GUNTUR DISTRICT.522237 2. THE COMMISSIONER AND DIRECTOR OF MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, OFFICE AT PRIME HILL CREST, 4TH FLOOR, NEAR DGP OFFICE, BESIDE ULTRATECH READY MIX PLANT, VADDESWARAM VILLAGE, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.522503 3. THE NELLORE URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT, REP BY ITS VICE CHAIRMAN / VICE CHAIRMAN. 524001 4. THE DIRECTOR OF TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING, ANDHRA PRADESH, MGM CAPITAL BUILDING, GROUND FLOOR, BACK SIDE OF DR. YSR AROGYASRI HEALTH CARE TRUST, NH-16 2 SERVICE ROAD, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 522503... ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of respondents in not refunding/re paying Rs. 16,21,411/- (Rupees Sixteen Lakhs Twenty One Thousand Four Hundred Eleven Only) collected from the petitioner/s vide Receipt No. RC/0183/2022 in BA No, 1105/0008/NU DA/2022 dated 26.06.2022 in pursuance of G.O.Ms.No. 145, MA and UD Department dated 06.12.2021, inspite of the fact that the 1st respondent has withdrawn the G.O.Ms.No. 145, MA and UD Department dated 06,12.2021 by way of issuing G.O.Ms.No.13, MA and UD Department dated 25.01.2023 and clarifying through Memo No. 2877356/M1/2025 dated 01-04-2026, as illegal, arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice and contrary to law, and consequently direct the respondents to refund/re-pay Rs. 16,21,411/- (Rupees Sixteen Lakhs Twenty One Thousand Four Hundred Eleven Only) collected from the petitioner/s vide Receipt No. RC/0183/2022 in BA No. 1105/0008/NU DA/2022 dated 26.06.2022, and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to DIRECT the respondents to refund/re-paying Rs. 16,21,411/- (Rupees Sixteen Lakhs Twenty One Thousand Four Hundred Eleven Only) collected from the petitioners vide Receipt No. RC/0183/2022 in BA No. 1105/0008/NUDA/2022 dated 26.06.2022 in view of G.O.Ms.No.13, MA&UD Department dated 25.01.2023 and clarifying through Memo No. 2877356/M 1/2025 dated 01-04-2026, pending disposal of the Writ Petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SREENIVASA RAO VELIVELA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV AP The Court made the following: 3 Order:- This Writ Petition is filed to declare the action of respondents in not refunding/re-paying Rs. 16,21,411/- (Rupees Sixteen Lakhs Twenty One Thousand Four Hundred Eleven Only) collected from the petitioner/s vide Receipt No. RC/0183/2022 in BA No, 1105/0008/NU DA/2022 dated 26.06.2022 in pursuance of G.O.Ms.No. 145, MA and UD Department dated 06.12.2021, inspite of the fact that the 1st respondent has withdrawn the G.O.Ms.No. 145, MA and UD Department dated 06,12.2021 by way of issuing G.O.Ms.No.13, MA and UD Department dated 25.01.2023 and clarifying through Memo No. 2877356/M1/2025 dated 01-04-2026. 2. However, both learned counsel submit that similar matters have already been allowed by this Court in W.P.No.8312 of 2023, vide order dated 04.04.2023, and W.P.No.8982 of 2024 and batch cases, vide common order dated 12.12.2024. 3. The operative portion of the order dated 04.04.2023 passed in W.P.No.8312 of 2023 reads as follows:- “Resultantly, the writ petition is allowed. The 4th respondent is directed to cancel the Gift Deed dated 23.11.2022 executed by the petitioner in terms of the earlier G.O.Ms.No.145, dated 06.12.2021 and to re- convey the said land of Ac.1.90 cents covered by Sy.No.191-2P of Karakavalasa Village in Vizianagaram District, to the petitioner within four (04) weeks from the date of receipt of a 4 copy of this order or from the date on which a copy of this order is placed before the 4th respondent, whichever is earlier. There shall be no order as to costs.” 4. The operative portion of the common order dated 12.12.2024 passed in W.P.No.8982 of 2024 and batch case reads as follows:- “Accordingly, these writ petitions are allowed in terms of the above said orders and the respondent authorities shall act upon either for re-conveyance of the gift deed or refund of the additional amount as expeditiously as possible to the petitioners, preferably within a period of twelve (12) weeks from the date of receipt of this order. There shall be no order as to costs.” 5. In terms of the aforesaid orders and for reasons alike, this writ petition also deserves to be allowed. 6. Accordingly, this writ petition is allowed in terms of the aforesaid orders and the 4th respondent shall refund the additional amount deposited by the petitioners as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of twelve (12) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs. 7. The Registry is directed to append copies of the order dated 04.04.2023 passed in W.P. No. 8312 of 2023 and the common order dated 12.12.2024 passed in W.P. No. 8982 of 2024 and batch to this order. 5 As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N 29.06.2026 PNS Whether the order is: Speaking Reasoned ☑ Reportable Non-reportable ☑