Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 38873 (KAR)

SMT PUSHPA K S v. SPECIAL OFFICER AND COMPETENT AUTHORITY

WP/24765/2025 · 2026-09-03

B M Shyam Prasad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010538832025 NC: 2026:KHC:48073 WP No. 24765 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 24765 OF 2025 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: SMT PUSHPA K S W/O RAVI PRASAD S S , AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, R/AT NO. 126/A, 4TH MAIN, RAGHAVENDRA NAGAR, MYSURU 570 011. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. MUNIYAPPA.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SPECIAL OFFICER AND COMPETENT AUTHORITY IMA AND OTHER KPID CASES, 3RD FLOOR, V V TOWER, DR B R AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU 560 001. Digitally signed by VANAMALA N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010538832025 NC: 2026:KHC:48073 WP No. 24765 of 2025 2. THE TAHSILDAR MYSURU TALUK, MYSURU 570 001. …RESPONDENTS ( VIDE ORDER DATED 08.10.2025; SRI. VEERESH BUDIHAL., ADVOCATE FOR R1; SRI. BOPANNA BELLIAPPA., AGA FOR R2) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO(A) ISSUE A WRIT OF MANDAMUS OR ANY OTHER WRIT OR ORDER DIRECTING THE RESPONDENTS TO HAND OVER PHYSICAL POSSESSION OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY TO THE PETITIONER ALONG WITH THE BOUNDARIES TO THE SCHEDULE IN THE SALE CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THE 1 (ST) RESPONDENT DATED 29.05.2024 (ANNEXURE-C) WHICH WAS REGISTERED BEFORE THE JURISDICTIONAL SUB- REGISTRAR ON 27.06.2024 (ANNEXURE-C1); (B) DIRECT THE 1 (ST) RESPONDENT TO ISSUE CERTIFICATE OF SALE MENTIONING THE BOUNDARIES TO THE SCHEDULE THEREIN IN FAVOUR OF THE PETITIONER. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010538832025 NC: 2026:KHC:48073 WP No. 24765 of 2025 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD ORAL ORDER The learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo which reads as under. “The petitioner does not press the above writ petition as against the respondents herein and hereby withdraw the above writ petition. Hence it is respectfully prayed that this Hon’ble Court be pleased to dismiss the above writ petition as withdrawn, in the interest of justice.” The memo is accepted and the petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (B M SHYAM PRASAD) JUDGE RB