Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 38870 (CHH)

SHRI SHIVCHAND PANKAJ v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/6955/2026 · 2026-10-06

Shri Bibhu Datta Guru

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 / 2 CGHC010359962026 2026:CGHC:43504 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 6955 of 2026 Shri Shivchand Pankaj S/o Anand Ram Pankaj Aged About 55 Years Presently Working As Lecturer (L.B.), Biology, Government Higher Secondary School, Lodha Block Ramchandrapur, District - Balrampur-Ramanujganj Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, School Education Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - The Director Directorate of Public Instruction, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 3 - Collector Korba District Korba Chhattisgarh 4 - District Education Officer Balrampur-Ramanujganj District Balrampur- Ramanujganj Chhattisgarh 5 - District Education Officer Korba, District Korba Chhattisgarh 6 - Principal Government Higher Secondary School Korbi (Dhatura) District Korba Chhattisgarh 7 - Principal Government Higher Secondary School Lodha District Balrampur- Ramanujganj Chhattisgarh ... Respondents For Petitioner : Ms. Deepika Kaushik, Advocate along with Mr. Munendra Kumar Sharma, Advocate For State/Respondent : Ms. Sakshi Bajpai, PL (Hon’ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru) Order on Board 07/10/2026 ASHUTOSH MISHRA Digitally signed by ASHUTOSH MISHRA Date: 2026.10.07 17:58:07 +0530 2 / 2 1. At the outset, learned State counsel, on instructions, submits that the medical leave of the petitioner for the period from 29.11.2022 to 09.04.2023, i.e. 132 days, has already been sanctioned and the said period has been converted into commuted leave. It is, therefore, submitted that the grievance raised by the petitioner stands redressed and nothing survives for further adjudication. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner do not dispute the aforesaid submission. 3. In view of the aforesaid submissions, the grievance of the petitioner having already been redressed, nothing further survives for consideration in the present writ petition. 4. The petition has, accordingly, rendered infructuous and is dismissed as having become infructuous. SD/- SD/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) JUDGE ashu