INDRAJIT SINGH @ INDRAJIT AND ANR. v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL
CRM(M)/1786/2026 · 2026-09-08
Tirthankar Ghosh
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 38868 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 38868 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
08.09.2026 Serial no. 12 [G.S.Das] Assistant Registrar (Court)
CRM (M) 1786 of 2026
In re : An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 in connection with Hirapur PS Cse No. 56 of 2026 dated 12.03.2026 u/s 105/3(5) of the BNS [GR No. 704 of 2026].
-And-
In the matter of : Indrajit Singh @ Indrajit &Anr.
… Petitioner(s)
Mr. Swapan Banerjee, Sr Adv. Mr. Moyukh Mukherjee Mr. Kaustav Banerjee
… for the Petitioner(s) Mr. Parmanand Sharma, APP Mr. Uttam Basak
… for the State-respondent(s)
Learned advocate for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are in custody for more than five months. There was a previous dispute pursuant to which on certain provocation the incident happened and the victim died after a period of about three days. Learned advocate for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that the victim was repeatedly banged on the wall, as such, could not tolerate the injuries which were suffered and finally succumbed to the injuries. I have taken into account the overall background of the case as also the fact that there was no deadly weapon used which are appearing from the case record.
2 Having considered the overall circumstances, I am of the view that the petitioners be released on bail. Hence, the prayer for bail of the petitioners is Allowed. Accordingly, the petitioners viz, [Indrajit Singh @ Indrajit and Harkirat Singh] shall be released on bail upon furnishing bond of Rs.20,000/-(Rupees Twenty Thousand only) each, with two sureties of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the Learned CJM, Asansol, Paschim Bardhaman. If on bail, the petitioners shall also make themselves physically available on each and every date so fixed by the learned trial court and shall not leave the district of Paschim Bardhaman without prior permission of the learned trial court. Accordingly, CRM (M) 1786 of 2026 is allowed. Pending application(s), if any, is also disposed of. Memo of evidence submitted be kept with the record. Parties to act on a server copy of this order duly collected from the official website of the Hon’ble High Court, Calcutta. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties subject to compliance with all requisite formalities.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)
3