Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 38862 (CAL)

SAMSUDDIN v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR

CRM(M)/1007/2026 · 2026-09-08

Tirthankar Ghosh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

M/L29 08.09.2026 Bpg. C.R.M. (M) 1007 of 2026 In Re: An application for bail under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023; Samsuddin Versus The State of West Bengal & Anr. Mr. Arunava Ganguly. ...for the petitioner. Mr. Pinaki Bhattacharyya. …for the State. Mr. Abhinav Rakshit. …for the de facto complainant. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that he has instruction to withdraw the present bail application. Learned advocate for the State and the de facto complainant are present. In view of the submission advanced by the petitioner, CRM(M)1007 of 2026 is dismissed as withdrawn. All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)