08.09.2026 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Item No.24 CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION Ct.No.35 dc. Rejected C.R.M. (M) 921 of 2026 In Re : An Application for bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 filed in connection with Tamluk Police Station Case No. 759 of 2025 dated 22.09.2025 under Sections 310(2)/311/317(3)/ 238/61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 read with Sections 25(1)(B)(a)/27/35 of the Arms Act, 1959 (G.R. Case No. 2708 of 2025). And In Re : Sonu Tomar ... Petitioner. Mr. Sabir Ahmed, Mr. Bhaskar Hutait, Mr. Quazi Ezaz Ahmed, Mr. Ayaan Bhattacharyya ... For the Petitioner. Mr. Kallol Mondal, Ld. PP, Mr. Bhaskar Seth, Ms. Shalu Gupta ... For the State. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the instant case. There has been no recovery from the present petitioner and he is a resident of Agra who has been vindictively implicated in the instant case. Learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State, on the other hand, opposes the prayer for bail and submits a report which reflects that there is no antecedent of the petitioner available in the nearby States. However, so far as the present case is concerned, there have been specific recoveries and overt acts of the present petitioner. Having considered the manner in which the offence was committed and the participation of the present 2 petitioner, I am not inclined to release the petitioner on bail at this stage. As such, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is rejected. Petitioner would renew his prayer for bail after the evidence of seizure list witnesses which are related to the petitioner is over. Learned Trial Court would give preference to examination of the said seizure list witnesses. Report submitted by the learned advocate appearing for the State be kept with the record. The application for bail, being CRM (M) 921 of 2026, is, thus, disposed of. Learned advocate for the State would communicate this order to the learned Trial Court. All concerned parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)