M/L35 08.09.2026 Bpg. C.R.M. (M) 1079 of 2026 In Re: An application for Bail under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 filed in connection with Manickchak Police Station Case No.704 of 2025 dated 09.09.2025 under Sections 103(1), 238 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023; Sultana Khatun Versus The State of West Bengal Mr. Rana Mukhopadhyay. ...for the petitioner. Mr. P. Karan Singh. …for the State. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the prosecution has framed the case against the present petitioner who is a lady and the same is without any substance. Unnecessarily petitioner has been detained since September, 2025 and there is no possibility of the trial commencing in near future, as such, petitioner be released on bail. Learned advocate for the State, on the other hand, submits that the throat of the deceased was slit. There are 11 injuries at the chest and 22 injuries at the abdomen region. It has also been submitted that the case cannot proceed because one of the accused person is absconding. Having considered the gravity of the offence, I am not inclined to release the petitioner on bail at this stage. Petitioner will renew her prayer for bail after the stage of consideration of charges 2 are over. So far as the learned jurisdictional court is concerned, I direct that the processes be exhausted against the absconding accused person and thereafter the case be committed to the court of sessions. Whole of the process be completed at the earliest. Learned sessions court would, within one month from the receipt of the records, overcome the stage of consideration of charges. At this stage, CRM(M)1079 of 2026 is dismissed. Memo of Evidence submitted by the State be kept with the record. All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance of all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)