Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 38849 (PNJ)

SAJJAN SINGH & ANR v. USHA DEVI & ORS

FAO/448/2013 · 2026-09-02

Subhas Mehla

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 204-2 & 3 Date of decision: 02.09.2026 1. FAO-448-2013 (O & M) SAJJAN SINGH AND ANOTHER ...APPELLANTS V/S USHA DEVI AND OTHERS ...RESPONDENTS 2. FAO-449-2013 (O & M) SAJJAN SINGH ...APPELLANT V/S DARSHAN SINGH (DECEASED) THROUGH LRS AND OTHERS ...RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHAS MEHLA Present: Ms. Ravinder Kaur, Advocate for Mr. Gurcharan Dass, Advocate for the appellant(s). (in both cases) None for respondent Nos.1 to 4 in FAO-448-2013 and for respondent Nos.1 to 3 in FAO-449-2013. Mr. Vishal Aggarwal, Advocate for Mr. G.S. Sarao, Advocate for respondent No.5 in FAO-448-2013 & for respondent No.4 in FAO-449-2013. Respondent No.6 in FAO-448-2013 & Respondent No.5 in FAO-449-2013 proceeded against ex parte vide order dated 08.08.2014. **** MANISHA 2026.09.09 13:45 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document FAO-448-2013 (O & M) -2- SUBHAS MEHLA, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the appellant(s) submits that the appellant(s) are not in contact with the counsel and requested that both the present appeals may be disposed of with liberty to the appellant(s) to revive the same in case any cause still survives. Prayer is accepted. In view of the above, both the appeals stand disposed of with the liberty as prayed for. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand(s) disposed of. A photocopy of this order be placed on the file of other connected case. (SUBHAS MEHLA) September 02, 2026 JUDGE Manisha (i) Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No (ii) Whether reportable Yes/No MANISHA 2026.09.09 13:45 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document