Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 38849 (CHH)

NAVIN KUMAR GUPTA (IN PERSON) v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPCR/573/2026 · 2026-10-05

Shri Narendra Kumar Vyas, Shri Sudhir Kumar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 CGHC010387602026 2026:CGHC:43179-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPCR No. 573 of 2026 1 - Navin Kumar Gupta (In Person) S/o R.N. Gupta, Aged About 44 Years, R/o - Mayavila 4/7 Shastri Nagar Supela Bhilai District - Durg (C.G.) (Petition In Person) (Mob. 9993866888) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Dwara Sachiv Nagriya Prashasan Vibhag, Mantralay Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar Nawa Raipur, Jila Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Police Adhikshak (S.P.) Jila Durg, C.G. 3 - Nagar Police Adhikshak (C.S.P.) Chhavni Bhilai, Jila Durg, C.G. 4 - Rakesh Khuteshwar Thana Prabhari Mahoday (T.I.) Jamul Bhilai, Jila Durg (C.G.) 5 - Mahfooj Khan Janch Adhikari (I.O.) Jamul Bhilai, Jila Durg (C.G.) 6 - Yesha Lahre Zone Aayukt - 2 Nagar Palik Nigam Bhilai, Jila Durg (C.G.) 7 - Sharad Dubey Sahayak Rajasva Adhikari Nagar Palik Nigam Bhilai Jila Durg (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner : The petitioner in person. For State : Mr. Saumya Rai, Dy. Govt. Adv. For respondents No. 6 & 7 : Mr. Bannoon on behalf of Mr. Siddhant Das, Advocates KISHORE KUMAR DESHMUKH Digitally signed by KISHORE KUMAR DESHMUKH Date: 2026.10.07 11:11:24 +0530 2 DB: Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas & Hon'ble Shri Justice Sudhir Kumar Judgment On Board 06.10.2026 Per Narendra Kumar Vyas,J. 1. The present Writ Petition (Cr.) has been filed by the petitioner praying for registration of FIR against the officers of the Municipal Corporation, respondents No. 4 to 7 alleging that the authorities have wrongly made survey report violating the direction issued by this Court in WPC No. 4626 of 2025. 2. The petitioner in person would submit that the respondents have wrongly assessed the property tax to the tune of Rs. 12,00,000/-. He has filed WPT No. 151/2026 challenging the alleged tax which is pending consideration before this Court. He would further submit that he has filed complaint before the police station against these officers but no action has been taken by the police. 3. Considering the submission made by the petitioner and the fact that the matter with regard to fixation of the property tax is sub-judice before this Court in WPT No. 151/2026, therefore, no case is made out for interference at this stage and accordingly no direction for registration of FIR can be issued against the respondents No. 4 to 7. 4. With the aforesaid observation, the present WPCR is dismissed. Sd/-/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge Sd/- (Sudhir Kumar) Judge Deshmukh