2026:JHHC:6825 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 1877 of 2026 1. Sonu @ Sohan Yadav @ Sonu Yadav, aged about 27 years, son of late Bhagirath Yadav 2. Anil Kumar Yadav @ Hola @ Anil Kumar, aged about 23 years, son of Dhanraj Gope Both are residents of Village – Sihodih, P/o – Sirsiya, P/s – Giridih (Muffsil) District – Giridih, Jharkhand … … Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Opposite Party --- CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioners : Mr. Mahesh Kr. Sinha, (2), Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. Shree Prakash Jha, Advocate --- 02/13.03.2026 Heard the learned counsels appearing on behalf of the parties. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are in custody since 18.12.2025 in connection with S.T. No.43/2026 arisen out of Giridih (T) P.S. Case No.132 of 2022, registered under Sections 147/148/149/341/323/324/307/364/379 of I.P.C, now pending in the court of learned Addl. Session Judge – III, Giridih. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that there is land dispute between the parties and petitioner no.2 has also filed a case against the informant of the present case under Section 302 of IPC. He has submitted that so far as the allegation in the present case is concerned, though the petitioners are named in the F.I.R., no overt act has been mentioned with respect to both the petitioners. The nature of injury is simple. The petitioners are in custody since 18.12.2025 and the charge sheet has already been submitted. 4. The learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer. However, he is not in a position to dispute the aforesaid submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners. 5. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the submissions made on behalf of the petitioners, it appears that there is a land dispute between the parties, the injuries sustained are simple in nature, and no specific overt act has been 2026:JHHC:6825 2 attributed to the petitioners, the petitioners are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/-(Rupees twenty-five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Addl. Session Judge – III, Giridih in connection with S.T. No.43/2026 arisen out of Giridih (T) P.S. Case No.132 of 2022, on the following conditions: (i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioners. (ii) The other bailors should be their close relative. (iii) The petitioners will attend the court on each and every date and on account of even single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioners. (iv) The petitioners will deposit a self-attested copy of their Aadhar Card along with their mobile number before the learned court which they will not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court. (v) The petitioners shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned trial court. 6. The instant application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions. 7. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the learned court concerned through “FAX/email”. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Date of Order:13.03.2026 Saurav Date of Uploading:13.03.2026