Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 38825 (CAL)

SUBHAJIT KUNDU v. THE CANARA BANK AND ORS.

WPA/26548/2025 · 2026-09-08

Rishad Medora

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

08.09.2026 Item No. 10 Court No.22. S. De 266462 WPA 26548 of 2025 Subhajit Kundu. Vs. The Canara Bank & Ors. Mr. Krishnendu Bera, …for the petitioner. Mr. Rabindra Kumar Mitra, Mr. S. Chakraborty, Ms. Debjani Bag, Ms. Susmita Nath, …for the respondent no.4. Ms. Jayita Roy, Mr. Subhash Ch. Sarkar, Mr. Rishav Roy, …for the respondent bank. 1. The petitioner is represented. 2. The respondent nos. 1 to 3 are represented. 3. The private respondent no.4 is also represented today. 4. Learned advocate representing the petitioner submits that he has instructions to withdraw this writ petition. He further prays for liberty to file afresh on the self same cause of action. Such prayer is allowed. 5. Accordingly, WPA 26548 of 2025 is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty given to the petitioner to file afresh. 6. Since no affidavit-in-opposition has been called for, the allegations made in the writ petition are 2 deemed not to have been admitted by the respondents. 7. All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. 8. Urgent Photostat certified copy of the order, if applied for, be given to the parties upon compliance with the requisite formalities. 9. No order as to costs. (Rishad Medora, J.)