08.09.2026 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Item No.482 CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION Ct.No.35 dc. Allowed C.R.M. (A) 2920 of 2026 In Re : An Application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 filed in connection with Thanarpara Police Station Case No. 174 of 2026 dated 18.06.2026 under Sections 126(2)/118(2)/ 109/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 3/4 of the Explosive Substances Act, 1908. And In Re : Jahirul Sk @ Shaikh ... Petitioner. Mr. Saryati Datta, Mr. Amanul Islam, Mr. Sourav Mukherjee, Mr. Gourav Roy ... For the Petitioner. Mr. Arindam Dey, Mr. Shoumilya Mazumder ... For the State. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in connection with the instant case. Learned advocate appearing for the State, on the other hand, opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail and submits that bombs were hurled and injuries consequently were sustained by five persons. The injury report was specifically pointed out to this Court and the injuries also reflected in respect of two of the injured persons that injuries are grievous in nature. Learned advocate also draws the attention of the Court to the statement under Section 183 of the BNSS. I have taken into account the materials appearing in the case diary in the background of the complicity of the 2 present petitioner. Having considered the statement of Mohasin Sk, I am of the opinion that custodial detention of the present petitioner in connection with the instant case is unwarranted. As such, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is allowed. Accordingly, in the event of arrest, the petitioner viz., Jahirul Sk @ Shaikh shall be released on bail to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer on such terms and conditions as he deems fit and proper and also be subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 corresponding to Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. As the investigation of the case is still in progress, the petitioner, within a period of ten days from date, shall make himself available before the Investigating Officer of the case and thereafter, the Investigating Officer of the case, if required, would fix subsequent dates for presence of the petitioner for the sake of investigation till the report in final form is submitted before the jurisdictional court. Memo of Evidence submitted by the learned advocate appearing for the State be kept with the record. The application for anticipatory bail, being CRM (A) 2920 of 2026, is, thus, disposed of. All concerned parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. 3 Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)