- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010380122025 NC: 2026:KHC:48510-DB CCC No.682 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI AND THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO.682 OF 2025 BETWEEN: SRI A.ABDUL REHMAN, S/O ABDUL RAWOOF, AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS, DODABASTHI GRAMA, RAMASANDRA DAKHALE, KENGERI HOBLI, BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK-560 074. …COMPLAINANT (BY SRI VASANTH KUMAR.H.T., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI P.MANIVANNAN, THE COMMISSIONER, THE BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BENGALURU-560 020. 2. SRI MANJUNATH DOMBARA, THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BENGALURU-560 020. 3. SRI RANGAPPA, THE SURVEYOR, ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION DIVISION, BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, BENGALURU-560 020. Digitally signed by K S RENUKAMBA Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010380122025 NC: 2026:KHC:48510-DB CCC No.682 of 2025 4. SRI RAVIKUMAR, THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, WEST DIVISION, BDA COMPLEX, VIJAYANAGARA, BENGALURU-560 040. 5. SRI BASAVARAJ, THE SURVEYOR, EXECUTIVE ENGINEER WEST DIVISION, BDA COMPLEX, VIJAYANAGARA, BENGALURU-560 040. …ACCUSED (BY SMT.POONAM S. PATIL, ADVOCATE FOR A1; A2, A4 & A5 ARE SERVED UNREPRESENTED) THIS CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTIONS 11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971, BY THE COMPLAINANT, PRAYING TO SECURE THE ACCUSED HEREIN, INITIATE CONTEMPT PROCEEDINGS FOR NON-COMPLIANCE OF ORDER PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE IN W.P.NO.10132/2024 (LA-BDA) DATED 09.07.2024 (ANNEXURE-A) AND PUNISH THE ACCUSED IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW. THIS CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI and HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI) Pursuant to the affidavit filed by accused No.1, learned Counsel for the complainant states that survey has been carried out in terms of the order passed by the writ Court in the presence of the complainant. However, it has not been correctly done as per Rules. - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010380122025 NC: 2026:KHC:48510-DB CCC No.682 of 2025 2. When queried, learned Counsel for the complainant fairly states that against the order passed for survey/demarcation, there exists a statutory right of an appeal. 3. In that view of the matter, no cause for maintaining this contempt case subsist. The contempt petition is consigned. It is open for the complainant to seek his statutory remedy strictly in accordance with law. Sd/- (JAYANT BANERJI) JUDGE Sd/- (TARA VITASTA GANJU) JUDGE KSR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 4